How should monofloral Manuka honey (K factor 16) be used therapeutically?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Therapeutic Use of Monofloral Manuka Honey (K Factor 16)

Manuka honey should not be used therapeutically for wound healing in diabetes-related foot ulcers due to insufficient evidence of benefit and potential risks. 1

Evidence Against Therapeutic Use in Wound Healing

The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) provides strong recommendations against using honey or bee-related products for wound healing in diabetes-related foot ulcers:

  • Strong recommendation with low certainty evidence against honey use for diabetic foot ulcers 1
  • Multiple guidelines consistently recommend against routine use of honey for wound healing 1
  • The only blinded study of royal jelly (another bee product) found no difference in healing over 12 weeks compared to placebo 1

Specific Concerns with Manuka Honey

While Manuka honey has gained attention for its antimicrobial properties, there are specific concerns regarding its use:

  • Manuka honey contains methylglyoxal (MG) at concentrations up to 100-fold higher than conventional honeys 2
  • MG is a potent protein-glycating agent and precursor of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) 2
  • MG and AGEs may potentially delay wound healing in diabetic patients 2
  • The K factor or UMF (Unique Manuka Factor) rating correlates with methylglyoxal content 3

Limited Evidence for Benefit

Despite widespread clinical use, evidence supporting Manuka honey's therapeutic benefits is limited:

  • Studies on honey products for wound healing are generally small, unblinded, and at high risk of bias 1
  • A Cochrane review concluded that the effects of honey relative to comparators on healing was unclear 1
  • Health services may wish to avoid routine use of honey dressings until sufficient evidence of effect is available 1

Potential Applications with Better Evidence

While not recommended for diabetic wounds, there is some evidence for other potential uses:

  • Recent research in a porcine model showed potential benefits for burn wound healing with increased collagen density and faster reepithelialization 4
  • Antimicrobial properties against antibiotic-resistant bacteria have been documented 5, 3
  • Manuka honey has been FDA-approved for some wound treatments, though evidence remains limited 5

Safety Considerations

When considering any therapeutic use of Manuka honey:

  • Allergic reactions are possible, particularly in individuals with bee product allergies 6
  • Quality and composition vary significantly based on bee feeding source, harvesting conditions, and geographic origin 6
  • Manuka honey supplements are not subject to the same FDA efficacy and safety standards as pharmaceuticals 6

Conclusion for Clinical Practice

For wound care, particularly in diabetic patients, current guidelines strongly recommend against using Manuka honey therapeutically. The potential risks of methylglyoxal in Manuka honey for diabetic wounds, combined with insufficient quality evidence of benefit, make it an inappropriate choice for wound healing in this population.

For other potential applications, such as antimicrobial uses or burn treatment, more research is needed before making definitive recommendations.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Methylglyoxal-a potential risk factor of manuka honey in healing of diabetic ulcers.

Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2011

Guideline

Royal Jelly: Therapeutic Use and Safety

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.