What are the considerations for a patient undergoing PainTEQ (Percutaneous Arthrodesis with Needle) Linq SI (Sacroiliac) joint fusion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

PainTEQ LinQ SI Joint Fusion: Considerations for Patient Management

For patients with chronic sacroiliac joint pain who have failed conservative management, the PainTEQ LinQ procedure is an effective minimally invasive posterior approach to SI joint fusion that provides significant long-term pain reduction with minimal complications.

Patient Selection Criteria

  • Diagnosis confirmation: Proper diagnosis by an expert rheumatologist/pain specialist is essential, with exclusion of other causes of low back pain
  • Failed conservative management: Patient should have tried and failed:
    • Physical therapy focusing on core stabilization
    • NSAIDs and analgesics
    • SI joint injections with temporary relief
  • Diagnostic confirmation: Positive response to diagnostic SI joint blocks (temporary pain relief)
  • Pain characteristics: Moderate to severe pain with functional impairment

Procedure Overview

The LinQ procedure utilizes a minimally invasive posterior approach with several key features:

  • Posterior transfixing device with single point S1/S2 level fixation
  • Allograft placement within the SI joint
  • Avoids neurovascular structures that would be encountered with traditional transiliac approaches
  • Can be performed percutaneously with fluoroscopic guidance

Efficacy Evidence

Recent research demonstrates significant clinical benefits:

  • Long-term efficacy data shows average pain reduction from 6.98 to 3.06 on the numeric rating scale (NRS) at average follow-up of 612.2 days 1
  • Particularly effective in patients with prior lumbar surgery, with pain reduction from 6.85 to 2.86 1
  • Meta-analysis shows posterior interpositional procedures provide mean improvement of 3.8 points in pain scores and 16.3 points in Oswestry Disability Index 2

Safety Profile

The LinQ procedure demonstrates an excellent safety profile:

  • No major adverse events reported in long-term follow-up studies 1
  • Meta-analysis shows very low complication rates for posterior approach SI joint fusion:
    • Acute symptomatic implant malposition: 0.2%
    • Wound infection: 0%
    • No reported device breakage or migration 2
  • Avoids potential vascular injuries that can occur with lateral approaches 3

Perioperative Considerations

Pre-procedure

  • Assess coagulation status and manage any anticoagulant medications
  • Consider pre-operative imaging (CT or MRI) to:
    • Rule out differential diagnoses that mimic SI joint pain
    • Assess sacral bone density
    • Identify any dysmorphic sacra or transitional vertebrae 3
  • Ensure patient has realistic expectations about outcomes (significant improvement rather than complete pain elimination)

Intra-procedure

  • Performed under general anesthesia in prone position
  • Fluoroscopic or 3D navigation guidance essential for accurate placement
  • Careful positioning to avoid nerve injury (particularly L5, S1, or S2 nerves)

Post-procedure

  • Pain management with multimodal approach including NSAIDs and acetaminophen 4
  • Limited weight-bearing and activity restrictions initially
  • Physical therapy to begin after adequate healing

Comparative Advantages

The posterior approach (LinQ) offers several advantages over lateral transiliac approaches:

  • Avoids neurovascular structures encountered with transiliac approaches
  • Lower risk profile for certain complications
  • Effective in patients with prior lumbar fusion 1
  • Less invasive than traditional open anterior or posterior approaches

Potential Complications

While rare, providers should be aware of potential complications:

  • Nerve injury (if implant is placed too ventral or too deep)
  • Implant malposition (though reported at only 0.2%)
  • Infection (extremely rare with proper technique)
  • Persistent pain or inadequate relief

Follow-up Recommendations

  • Regular assessment of pain levels and functional improvement
  • Radiographic follow-up to confirm proper implant position
  • Continued physical therapy for core strengthening
  • Gradual return to activities as tolerated

The PainTEQ LinQ procedure represents an important advancement in minimally invasive SI joint fusion with demonstrated long-term efficacy and safety for appropriately selected patients with chronic SI joint pain.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.