What is the false positive rate of the Signatera (circulating tumor DNA) test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

False Positive Rate of Signatera Test

  • The false positive rate of the Signatera (circulating tumor DNA) test is not directly stated in the provided studies.
  • However, study 1 mentions that five of the 122 nonrelapsed patients (all hormone receptor-positive) had an occasional positive test, suggesting a potential false positive rate.
  • Study 2 does not provide information on the false positive rate of the Signatera test.
  • Study 3 does not provide information on the false positive rate of the Signatera test.
  • Study 4 does not provide information on the false positive rate of the Signatera test.

Related Information

  • Study 1 reports a patient-level sensitivity of 88.2% for the Signatera test in detecting molecular relapse in patients with breast cancer.
  • Study 5 discusses the potential of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) copy number variant detection for cancer screening, but does not provide information on the false positive rate of the Signatera test.
  • Study 2 reports a 100% sensitivity of the Signatera test in detecting recurrence in patients with gastrointestinal cancers.
  • Study 3 reports a significant association between ctDNA positivity and disease progression in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Study 4 reports that ctDNA detection preceded the clinical diagnosis of recurrence by a median of 9 weeks in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.