How is Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) diagnosed based on peritoneal fluid cell count?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnosis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis Based on Peritoneal Fluid Cell Count

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is diagnosed when the ascitic fluid neutrophil count is ≥250 cells/mm³, regardless of whether the bacterial culture is positive or negative. 1

Collection and Processing of Peritoneal Fluid

  • Diagnostic paracentesis is mandatory for all cirrhotic patients with ascites at hospital admission to rule out SBP 1
  • Paracentesis should also be performed in patients with:
    • Gastrointestinal bleeding
    • Fever or other signs of systemic inflammation
    • Abdominal pain or gastrointestinal symptoms
    • Worsening liver or renal function
    • Hepatic encephalopathy
    • Shock 1

Calculating and Interpreting Neutrophil Count

  1. Collection method: Obtain ascitic fluid via paracentesis (left lower quadrant is preferred site - 3 cm cephalad and 3 cm medial to anterior superior iliac spine) 1

  2. Processing: Centrifuge the fluid sample and prepare a smear with Giemsa stain for microscopic examination 1, 2

  3. Calculation of absolute neutrophil count:

    • Formula: Total WBC count × (% neutrophils ÷ 100) 2
    • Example: If total WBC is 1000 cells/mm³ with 70% neutrophils, absolute neutrophil count = 700 cells/mm³
  4. Diagnostic thresholds:

    • ≥250 neutrophils/mm³: Diagnostic of SBP (highest sensitivity) 1
    • ≥500 neutrophils/mm³: Higher specificity but may miss some cases 1

Clinical Scenarios and Interpretation

  1. Culture-positive neutrocytic ascites:

    • Neutrophil count ≥250 cells/mm³ with positive bacterial culture
    • Definitive SBP diagnosis 1
  2. Culture-negative neutrocytic ascites:

    • Neutrophil count ≥250 cells/mm³ with negative bacterial culture
    • Should be treated as SBP 1
  3. Bacterascites:

    • Neutrophil count <250 cells/mm³ with positive bacterial culture
    • Management:
      • If patient has signs of infection/inflammation: Treat as SBP
      • If asymptomatic: Repeat paracentesis when culture results return
      • If repeat neutrophil count ≥250 cells/mm³: Treat as SBP
      • If repeat neutrophil count remains <250 cells/mm³: Follow up 1

Potential Pitfalls and Considerations

  • Automated cell counters may be used as they show good correlation with manual counts 1
  • Reagent strips (dipsticks) are NOT recommended for rapid diagnosis due to low sensitivity and high risk of false negatives 1, 2
  • Clinical impression and ascitic fluid appearance are unreliable for ruling out SBP (sensitivity of clinical impression only 42%) 3
  • Secondary bacterial peritonitis should be suspected with:
    • Multiple organisms on culture
    • Very high neutrophil count
    • High ascitic protein concentration
    • Inadequate response to therapy 1

When to Start Treatment

  • Empiric antibiotic therapy must be initiated immediately after SBP diagnosis (neutrophil count ≥250 cells/mm³) 1
  • Do not wait for culture results before starting antibiotics 1
  • Third-generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime) are first-line therapy 1

SBP is a serious complication with high mortality, especially when associated with renal impairment (mortality rates of 36-100% depending on severity of renal dysfunction) 4. Early diagnosis through proper ascitic fluid analysis and prompt treatment are essential for improving outcomes.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Renal impairment after spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: incidence and prognosis.

Canadian journal of gastroenterology = Journal canadien de gastroenterologie, 2003

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.