Are individuals previously infected with anaplasmosis more susceptible to reinfection if bitten by another infected tick?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Susceptibility to Anaplasmosis Reinfection After Previous Infection

Individuals previously infected with anaplasmosis are not more susceptible to reinfection if bitten by another infected tick. Based on the available evidence, there is no indication that prior infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum increases vulnerability to subsequent infections.

Understanding Anaplasmosis Immunity

Anaplasmosis is caused by the intracellular bacterium Anaplasma phagocytophilum, which primarily infects granulocytes, particularly neutrophils 1. The clinical course and immune response suggest that:

  • The infection induces a systemic inflammatory response that typically resolves with appropriate treatment 1
  • Virtually all patients develop serum antibodies to A. phagocytophilum after completion of antibiotic therapy 2
  • Seroconversion is demonstrated by indirect immunofluorescent antibody testing of acute-phase and convalescent-phase serum samples 2

Evidence on Reinfection Risk

The evidence does not support increased susceptibility to reinfection:

  • A study examining humans bitten by A. phagocytophilum-infected ticks found that the risk of seroconversion or clinical disease was low, even among those previously exposed 3
  • The overall prevalence of Anaplasma IgG antibodies in the study participants was 17%, suggesting prior exposure, yet this did not correlate with increased risk of symptomatic infection after new tick bites 3
  • Only one participant showed a four-fold increase in IgG antibodies against A. phagocytophilum at three-month follow-up, and this person remained asymptomatic 3

Clinical Implications

For patients with a history of anaplasmosis:

  • Standard tick bite prevention measures should be emphasized
  • The same clinical vigilance should be maintained for symptoms following a tick bite, regardless of prior infection history
  • Treatment approach remains the same for suspected anaplasmosis cases:
    • Doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 10 days in adults 4
    • Alternative treatments like rifampin for those with contraindications to tetracyclines 4

Important Considerations for Clinicians

Diagnostic Approach

When evaluating patients with possible anaplasmosis:

  • Look for characteristic symptoms: fever, headache, malaise, myalgia, and shaking chills 1
  • Monitor for laboratory findings: thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, elevated hepatic transaminases 1
  • Consider examining blood smears for morulae within granulocytes 1

Potential Pitfalls

  1. Confusing with other tick-borne diseases: Anaplasmosis can be clinically indistinguishable from other tick-borne illnesses, particularly in early stages 1

  2. Missing coinfections: The tick vector (I. scapularis in eastern US) can transmit multiple pathogens:

    • Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease)
    • Babesia microti
    • Borrelia miyamotoi
    • Deer tick virus 1
  3. Delayed treatment: Prompt treatment with doxycycline is essential, especially for older or immunocompromised patients who are at higher risk for severe disease 2

While there is no evidence suggesting increased susceptibility to reinfection with anaplasmosis, all patients with a history of tick exposure in endemic areas should be monitored for symptoms, regardless of prior infection status.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Clinical diagnosis and treatment of human granulocytotropic anaplasmosis.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2006

Guideline

Anaplasmosis Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.