Can Verquvo (Vericiguat) be used in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 50%?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Vericiguat (Verquvo) Should Not Be Used in Patients with LVEF of 50%

Vericiguat (Verquvo) is not recommended for patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 50% as it is only indicated for patients with LVEF <45% who have had a recent heart failure decompensation event. 1

Evidence-Based Rationale

LVEF Criteria for Vericiguat Use

Vericiguat is specifically indicated for patients with:

  • LVEF <45% (not 50% or higher)
  • Symptomatic chronic heart failure (NYHA class II-IV)
  • Recent heart failure hospitalization or need for outpatient IV diuretics
  • Elevated natriuretic peptide levels 1

The VICTORIA trial, which established vericiguat's efficacy, exclusively enrolled patients with LVEF <45% who had experienced a recent worsening heart failure event 2. There is no evidence supporting its use in patients with LVEF of 50% or higher.

Heart Failure Classification Considerations

Patients with LVEF of 50% fall into the HFpEF (Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction) category according to current guidelines:

  • HFrEF: LVEF ≤40%
  • HFmrEF: LVEF 41-49%
  • HFpEF: LVEF ≥50% 1

Vericiguat's mechanism as a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator was specifically studied and approved for HFrEF patients, not for those with preserved ejection fraction 3.

Treatment Approach Based on LVEF

For Patients with LVEF ≥50% (HFpEF)

  • Diuretics for symptom relief due to volume overload (Class I, Level C) 1
  • Management of hypertension with beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, or ARBs (Class IIa, Level C) 1
  • Management of atrial fibrillation according to published guidelines (Class IIa, Level C) 1
  • ARBs might be considered to decrease hospitalizations (Class IIb, Level B) 1

For Patients with LVEF <45% (Where Vericiguat Would Be Appropriate)

Vericiguat can be considered in addition to standard GDMT for patients who:

  • Have LVEF <45%
  • Are symptomatic (NYHA class II-IV)
  • Have had a recent heart failure hospitalization within 6 months or received IV diuretics without hospitalization
  • Have elevated natriuretic peptide levels 1, 3

Clinical Implications and Pitfalls

Important Considerations

  • Using medications outside their evidence-based LVEF range may lead to harm or lack of benefit
  • In HCM patients with LVEF ≥50%, cardiac myosin inhibitors (like mavacamten) should be discontinued if LVEF falls below 50% 1
  • For patients with LVEF of 50%, focus should be on appropriate HFpEF therapies rather than medications indicated for reduced EF

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Misclassification of heart failure type: Ensure accurate LVEF measurement and proper classification of heart failure type before selecting therapy
  2. Inappropriate extrapolation of evidence: Don't assume medications effective in HFrEF will work similarly in HFpEF
  3. Overlooking guideline-recommended therapies: For LVEF of 50%, focus on diuretics for symptom relief and management of comorbidities

Conclusion

Based on current guidelines and clinical evidence, vericiguat should be reserved for patients with LVEF <45% who have had a recent heart failure decompensation event. For patients with LVEF of 50%, other guideline-directed therapies specific to HFpEF should be utilized instead.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Vericiguat: A Review in Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.