What is the recommended method for testing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in a child?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Testing for H. pylori in Children

The urea breath test (UBT) and stool antigen test (SAT) are the recommended non-invasive methods for diagnosing H. pylori infection in children, with UBT being the preferred first-line test due to its higher sensitivity and specificity. 1, 2

Non-Invasive Testing Options

Urea Breath Test (UBT)

  • Sensitivity: 94.7%, Specificity: 95.7% 2
  • Advantages:
    • Highly accurate for initial diagnosis
    • Easy to perform
    • No special transport conditions required
    • Can be used to confirm eradication
  • Limitations:
    • Requires cessation of PPIs, antibiotics, and bismuth products for 2 weeks prior to testing 1, 2
    • Slightly more expensive than serology
    • May produce false-negative results in 10-40% of cases if patient is on PPIs 1
    • False positives can occur with achlorhydria or non-H. pylori urease-producing organisms 2

Stool Antigen Test (SAT)

  • Sensitivity: 88.8-92.1%, Specificity: 87.3-87.6% 2
  • Advantages:
    • Good alternative when UBT is not available
    • Can be used for initial diagnosis and confirming eradication
    • Less affected by PPI use than UBT
  • Limitations:
    • Requires stool sample (potential patient aversion)
    • Requires cessation of PPIs, antibiotics, and bismuth for 2 weeks prior to testing 1
    • Slightly lower accuracy than UBT

Serology (IgG antibody testing)

  • Advantages:
    • Not affected by recent use of PPIs, antibiotics, or bismuth 1
    • Inexpensive and widely available
  • Limitations:
    • Cannot differentiate between active and past infection 2
    • Cannot be used to confirm eradication 2
    • Requires local validation as antigenic properties of bacterial strains may differ 1
    • Only recommended in high pretest probability situations 2

When to Use Invasive Testing

Endoscopy with biopsy-based tests should be considered in children with:

  • Age over 45 years (adults) 1
  • Presence of alarm symptoms (regardless of age) 1:
    • Anemia
    • Weight loss
    • Dysphagia
    • Palpable mass
    • Malabsorption
    • Bleeding

During endoscopy, the following tests can be performed:

  • Rapid urease test
  • Histology
  • Culture (allows for antimicrobial susceptibility testing)
  • PCR-based molecular testing for antibiotic resistance 1

Testing Algorithm for Children

  1. Initial Assessment:

    • For children without alarm symptoms: Use non-invasive testing
    • For children with alarm symptoms: Refer for endoscopy
  2. Non-invasive Testing Approach:

    • First choice: Urea breath test (UBT)
    • Alternative: Stool antigen test (SAT)
    • Serology only if patient has been on recent PPI/antibiotic therapy and testing cannot be delayed
  3. Pre-test Preparation:

    • Stop PPIs for 2 weeks before testing 1
    • Stop antibiotics for 2 weeks before testing
    • Stop bismuth products for 2 weeks before testing
  4. Post-treatment Testing:

    • Wait at least 4 weeks after completion of eradication therapy 3
    • Use UBT or SAT (not serology) to confirm eradication

Special Considerations for Children

  • Family members of patients with proven H. pylori infections should be considered for testing 2
  • First-generation immigrants from high-prevalence areas and high-risk ethnic groups should be considered for testing 2
  • When using UBT in children, ensure appropriate age-specific protocols are followed
  • For very young children who cannot perform the breath test properly, stool antigen testing may be more practical

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Using serology to confirm eradication (antibodies remain elevated for months after successful treatment) 1
  • Testing while patient is on PPIs, antibiotics, or bismuth (increases false-negative results) 1
  • Failing to wait at least 4 weeks after treatment before confirming eradication 3
  • Using rapid "office" serological tests, which have disappointing sensitivity and specificity 1
  • Relying on IgA or IgM tests, which have low specificity and sensitivity 1

By following this evidence-based approach to testing for H. pylori in children, clinicians can accurately diagnose infection and monitor treatment success while minimizing unnecessary invasive procedures.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Autoimmune Gastritis and Helicobacter Pylori Infection

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.