R-ICE Protocol for Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
R-ICE (Rituximab, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide) is a highly effective salvage chemotherapy regimen for transplant-eligible patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, with an overall response rate of approximately 85-89%. 1
Components and Administration
The R-ICE regimen consists of:
- Rituximab: 375 mg/m² IV on day 1
- Ifosfamide: 5000 mg/m² IV, divided into three equal doses given over days 1-3
- Carboplatin: Dosed at AUC 5 IV on day 1
- Etoposide: 100 mg/m² IV daily for 3 days (days 1-3)
- G-CSF (Filgrastim): 5 μg/kg subcutaneously daily starting from day 5
The regimen is typically administered every 21 days as an outpatient treatment 1.
Clinical Applications
R-ICE is primarily used in:
- Second-line therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are candidates for high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue 2
- Stem cell mobilization prior to autologous stem cell transplantation 1
- Salvage therapy for other aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas including follicular lymphoma (often with rituximab) 3
Efficacy
- Overall response rates of 87-89% have been reported 3, 1
- Complete response rates of approximately 29-37% 3, 1
- Partial response rates of approximately 50-60% 3, 1
- For DLBCL specifically, overall response rate of 85% (36% CR, 49% PR) 1
Stem Cell Mobilization Capability
R-ICE is effective for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization:
- Median time to PBSC harvest: 14 days
- Median CD34+ cell yield: 4.8-5.2 × 10⁶ cells/kg
- Mobilization failure rate: approximately 7% 1
Toxicity Profile
Hematological Toxicities
- Grade III/IV thrombocytopenia: 71% of patients
- Grade III/IV neutropenia: 72% of patients 1
- Febrile neutropenia risk >20% (classified as high-risk regimen) 2
Non-Hematological Toxicities
- CNS toxicity (grade 1/2): uncommon
- Cardiac toxicity: rare
- Renal impairment: rare
- Hepatotoxicity: rare 1
Important Considerations
Patient Selection: Best suited for transplant-eligible patients (generally age <65 years) with good performance status and no major organ dysfunction 2
Pre-Treatment Assessment:
- Evaluate cumulative anthracycline exposure from prior therapy
- Assess cardiac function (MUGA or echocardiography) if previous anthracycline exposure
- Determine International Prognostic Index (IPI) score
- Complete staging workup including CT scans and bone marrow assessment 2
Supportive Care:
- G-CSF support is essential to manage neutropenia
- Prophylactic antibiotics may be considered
- Adequate hydration and mesna administration with ifosfamide to prevent hemorrhagic cystitis
Treatment Algorithm
For transplant-eligible patients (age <65, good performance status):
- Administer 2-3 cycles of R-ICE
- Assess response after 2 cycles
- If responsive, proceed to stem cell collection and high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation 2
For non-transplant candidates:
- R-ICE can still be used but with dose modifications as needed
- Consider alternative regimens with lower toxicity profiles
- May combine with involved field radiotherapy 2
Monitoring and Response Assessment
- Complete blood counts before each cycle
- Radiological assessment after 2-4 cycles of therapy (before stem cell collection)
- Final response assessment after completion of all planned therapy 2
Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls
- Rituximab addition: May not be beneficial in patients who were refractory to a previous rituximab-containing regimen 2
- Hydration: Adequate hydration is critical when administering ifosfamide to prevent nephrotoxicity
- Outpatient administration: Despite its intensity, R-ICE can be safely administered in the outpatient setting with proper monitoring 3, 1
- Stem cell collection timing: Optimal timing for stem cell collection is typically around day 14 of the cycle 1
R-ICE represents one of several effective salvage regimens for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with comparable efficacy to other regimens such as R-DHAP, R-ESHAP, and R-GDP, though no head-to-head comparative trials have established superiority of any one regimen 2.