What is the indication for the Watchman (Left Atrial Appendage Closure) device in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Indications for Watchman Device in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation

The Watchman left atrial appendage closure device is indicated for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are at increased risk of stroke (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥2 for men or ≥3 for women), and have contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulation or have an appropriate rationale to seek a non-pharmacological alternative to warfarin. 1

Patient Selection Criteria

The primary candidates for Watchman device implantation include:

  • Patients with elevated stroke risk who are deemed unsuitable for prolonged anticoagulation 1
  • Patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation therapy, including:
    • History of major bleeding events
    • High risk of bleeding (HAS-BLED score ≥3)
    • Inability to maintain stable INR on warfarin
    • Medication non-compliance issues
    • Lifestyle considerations that make anticoagulation challenging 1

Evidence Supporting Watchman Use

The Watchman device has been evaluated in multiple clinical trials demonstrating:

  • Non-inferiority to warfarin for the composite endpoint of stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death 1, 2
  • Significantly lower hemorrhagic stroke rates compared to warfarin 1, 2
  • Reduced cardiovascular death and reduced bleeding beyond the immediate post-procedural period 1

The EWOLUTION trial showed consistently low rates of stroke (1.3/100 patient-years, 83% reduction versus historic data) and major nonprocedural bleeding events (2.7/100 patient-years, 46% reduction) in high-risk patients, most of whom were contraindicated to oral anticoagulation 3.

Recent 2024 data comparing Watchman to DOACs in high-risk patients with prior major bleeding showed that Watchman was associated with significantly lower rates of major bleeding events, TIAs, and ischemic strokes over 5 years 4.

Guideline Recommendations

The 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines classify the recommendation for Watchman as Class IIb (may be considered) with Level B-NR evidence 1. This reflects that:

  • Oral anticoagulation (preferably NOACs) remains the first-line therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation
  • Watchman is considered for specific populations with contraindications or challenges with long-term anticoagulation

Procedural Considerations

The Watchman procedure involves:

  • Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion under general anesthesia with TEE guidance
  • Transseptal puncture, device sizing, and deployment at the ostium of the LAA 1

A multidisciplinary team approach is recommended for patient selection and management, including:

  • Electrophysiologists
  • Interventional cardiologists
  • Neurologists
  • Imaging experts
  • Primary care providers
  • Cardiac surgeons 1

Post-Procedure Management

The standard post-implantation anticoagulation regimen includes:

  1. 0-45 days: Warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) + Aspirin (81-100mg daily)
  2. 45 days-6 months: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT): Aspirin (81-325mg daily) and Clopidogrel (75mg daily)
  3. >6 months: Aspirin (81-325mg daily) indefinitely 1

A transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is performed at 45 days to check for:

  • Device position
  • Peri-device leak (should be ≤5mm)
  • Device-related thrombus 1

Potential Complications

Important complications to monitor include:

  • Pericardial effusion (4.4-7.1% of patients)
  • Device embolization
  • Procedure-related ischemic stroke
  • Device-related thrombus formation 1, 5

Clinical Pearls

  • The left atrial appendage is the source of approximately 90% of thrombi in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation 1
  • Operator experience significantly impacts complication rates 1
  • Patients with absolute contraindications to OACs/DOACs may be managed with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) alone 5
  • The ASAP study demonstrated that LAA closure with the Watchman device can be safely performed without a warfarin transition in patients with contraindications to systemic oral anticoagulation 6

The Watchman device represents an important alternative for stroke prevention in carefully selected patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who cannot tolerate long-term anticoagulation or have compelling reasons to seek non-pharmacological options.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.