What is the incidence of progressive osteoarthritis in shoulders following a Latarjet procedure for instability?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Incidence of Progressive Osteoarthritis Following Latarjet Procedure for Shoulder Instability

The incidence of progressive osteoarthritis following the Latarjet procedure ranges from 8-42% at 5-year follow-up and 9-71% at 10-year follow-up, with most cases being mild (grade 1) osteoarthritis. 1

Prevalence and Severity of Post-Latarjet Osteoarthritis

The development of glenohumeral osteoarthritis following the Latarjet procedure is a recognized long-term complication, but its prevalence varies across studies:

  • A 2023 study with 22-year follow-up found an osteoarthritis rate of 34.1% 2
  • A systematic review of studies with minimum 5-year follow-up found osteoarthritis rates of 25.8%, with 88.6% of these cases being mild (grade 1) according to the Samilson and Prieto classification 3
  • Another long-term study with 20-year follow-up reported that:
    • 20% of shoulders without preoperative arthritis developed it postoperatively
    • 50% of shoulders with preoperative arthritis showed progression
    • Overall distribution: 14.7% stage 1,5.9% stage 2,8.8% stage 3, and no stage 4 arthritis 4

Risk Factors for Osteoarthritis Development

Several factors influence the development or progression of osteoarthritis after the Latarjet procedure:

Surgical Factors (Modifiable)

  • Lateral bone graft overhang: This is the most significant surgical risk factor 2, 3, 4
    • 71.4% osteoarthritis rate with lateral overhang vs. 16.7% with medial or flush bone block positioning 2

Patient Factors (Non-modifiable)

  • Advanced age at surgery 2, 4
  • Age >30 years at first instability episode 2
  • High-demand sports activity 4

Protective Factors

  • Hyperlaxity appears to have a protective role against osteoarthritis development 3

Non-significant Factors

  • Number of dislocations before surgery 2, 3
  • Presence of Hill-Sachs lesion 3
  • Gender 3
  • Time between first dislocation and surgery 3

Clinical Impact of Post-Latarjet Osteoarthritis

Despite the development of radiographic osteoarthritis, the clinical impact appears limited:

  • The clinical impact of osteoarthritis is significant only in advanced stages (Samilson 3 and 4) 2
  • Patient satisfaction remains high (90.9%) even at long-term follow-up 2
  • Good functional outcomes persist with mean Constant scores of 83.5±14 and Walch-Duplay scores of 71.6±23.4 at 22-year follow-up 2
  • Recurrent instability rates remain low (1.59-5.9%) at long-term follow-up 4, 5

Clinical Implications and Recommendations

Based on these findings:

  • Surgeons should prioritize accurate coracoid graft positioning, ensuring it is flush with the glenoid rim rather than laterally overhanging
  • Specific instrumentation and arthroscopic techniques may facilitate optimal graft positioning 2
  • Patients should be counseled about the risk of developing mild osteoarthritis over time, but reassured that this rarely impacts function significantly
  • Younger patients (<30 years at first instability) may have lower risk of developing osteoarthritis
  • Regular radiographic follow-up is warranted to monitor for arthritis development or progression

The Latarjet procedure remains a valid and safe surgical treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a low risk of developing moderate or severe osteoarthritis, even at long-term follow-up 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.