Is type C indicated for Myringotomy (surgical incision into the eardrum) + Tympanostomy Tube (Grommet Tube) Insertion?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

Type C tympanogram is often an indication for myringotomy with grommet (ventilation) tube insertion, as it suggests eustachian tube dysfunction and potential for recurrent otitis media, hearing loss, and developmental delays in children. This condition is typically characterized by negative middle ear pressure, which can lead to a range of complications if left untreated. Myringotomy with tube insertion creates an alternative ventilation pathway that equalizes pressure between the middle ear and external environment, bypassing the dysfunctional eustachian tube. However, a Type C tympanogram alone is usually not sufficient justification for surgery, and clinicians typically consider additional factors such as:

  • Persistent middle ear effusion (lasting 3+ months)
  • Recurrent acute otitis media (3+ episodes in 6 months or 4+ episodes in 12 months)
  • Associated hearing loss, speech delays, or balance issues The procedure is relatively quick (10-15 minutes) and typically performed under general anesthesia in children or local anesthesia in adults, with tubes generally remaining in place for 6-18 months before spontaneously extruding 1. Recent studies have also explored the use of alternative anesthetic approaches, such as the addition of intravenous propofol and ketorolac to a sevoflurane anesthetic, which has been shown to reduce emergence agitation in children undergoing bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion 1. Additionally, the use of gelfoam graft material in myringoplasty has been found to be a safe and viable alternative with favorable short and long term clinical and audiometric outcomes 2.

Some key points to consider when evaluating the need for myringotomy and tube insertion include:

  • The presence of a Type C tympanogram, which suggests eustachian tube dysfunction
  • The duration and severity of middle ear effusion or recurrent acute otitis media
  • The presence of associated hearing loss, speech delays, or balance issues
  • The potential benefits and risks of the procedure, including the risk of emergence agitation and the potential for spontaneous extrusion of the tube.

Overall, the decision to perform myringotomy and tube insertion should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of the individual patient's needs and circumstances, taking into account the latest evidence and guidelines in the field 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.