Can a computed tomography (CT) chest angiogram be ordered for a pregnant patient?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CT Chest Angiogram in Pregnancy: Safety and Recommendations

CT chest angiogram can be performed in pregnant patients when clinically indicated, but ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning is preferred as the first-line imaging modality for suspected pulmonary embolism due to lower maternal breast radiation exposure.

Radiation Safety Considerations

Fetal Radiation Exposure

  • The fetal radiation dose from CT chest angiogram is approximately 0.3 mGy 1
  • This is well below the danger threshold for fetal injury, which is considered to be 50 mSv (50,000 mGy) 1
  • All radiological tests used for pulmonary embolism diagnosis fall significantly below this threshold 1

Maternal Radiation Exposure

  • CT chest angiogram delivers approximately 7 mGy to maternal tissues 1
  • The primary concern with CT chest angiography in pregnant women is the higher radiation dose to maternal breast tissue compared to V/Q scanning 1
  • This higher breast radiation exposure results in a small but significant increase in lifetime risk of breast cancer 1

Imaging Algorithm for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Pregnancy

  1. First-line approach: V/Q scanning when available

    • Preferred over CT due to lower maternal breast radiation exposure 1
    • Diagnostic yield in pregnancy is approximately 80% 1
    • Ventilation scan may be unnecessary if chest X-ray is normal, further limiting radiation exposure 1
  2. When to use CT chest angiogram:

    • When V/Q scanning is not available 1
    • In patients with abnormal chest radiographs 1
    • When immediate diagnosis is critical in hemodynamically unstable patients 1
  3. Additional considerations:

    • D-dimer testing may be used, but has limited utility as levels physiologically increase throughout pregnancy 1
    • Lower-limb compression ultrasound may be performed if D-dimer is abnormal, as proximal DVT warrants anticoagulation and makes thoracic imaging unnecessary 1

Documentation and Communication

  • Document radiation dose to the mother in medical records, particularly if the fetus is in the field of view 1
  • Discuss risks and benefits with the patient, emphasizing that:
    • The risk of missing a potentially fatal diagnosis outweighs radiation concerns 1
    • Erroneously diagnosing PE also carries risks of unnecessary anticoagulation 1

Key Principles to Remember

  • Follow the ALARA principle: "As Low As Reasonably Achievable" for radiation exposure 1
  • The decision to perform imaging should aim for diagnostic certainty rather than avoiding radiation at all costs 1
  • Conventional pulmonary angiography carries significantly higher radiation exposure (2.2-3.7 mSv) and should be avoided during pregnancy 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Delaying necessary imaging due to unfounded radiation concerns
  • Using conventional pulmonary angiography instead of CT or V/Q scanning
  • Failing to consider alternative diagnoses for dyspnea in pregnancy
  • Not documenting radiation exposure in medical records
  • Overlooking the availability of V/Q scanning as a preferred first option

In conclusion, while V/Q scanning is preferred when available, CT chest angiogram remains a safe and valuable diagnostic tool for pregnant patients when clinically indicated, with radiation doses well below thresholds of concern for fetal injury.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.