What is the significance of measuring C (connecting) peptide levels in patients with diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Clinical Significance of C-peptide Measurement in Diabetes Management

C-peptide measurement is a crucial tool for classifying diabetes type, determining insulin requirements, and guiding appropriate treatment strategies in patients with diabetes. 1

What is C-peptide?

  • C-peptide (connecting peptide) is produced in equal amounts to insulin during the cleavage of proinsulin in pancreatic beta cells 2
  • Unlike insulin, C-peptide is minimally extracted by the liver and has a longer half-life, making it a more reliable marker of endogenous insulin production 3
  • C-peptide can be measured even in patients already receiving insulin therapy, as exogenous insulin does not contain C-peptide 2

Clinical Utility of C-peptide Measurement

1. Diabetes Classification

C-peptide levels can help differentiate between diabetes types based on the following ranges 1:

  • <0.6 ng/mL (<200 pmol/L): Type 1 diabetes pattern - requires insulin therapy
  • 0.6-1.8 ng/mL (200-600 pmol/L): Indeterminate - may need additional testing
  • >1.8 ng/mL (>600 pmol/L): Type 2 diabetes pattern - consider non-insulin therapies

2. Treatment Decision-Making

  • Very low C-peptide (<0.6 ng/mL) indicates the need for immediate basal-bolus insulin therapy 1
  • Borderline low C-peptide (0.6-1.8 ng/mL) may warrant basal insulin plus oral agents with close monitoring 1
  • Higher C-peptide levels suggest preserved beta cell function, allowing for consideration of non-insulin therapies 1

3. Identifying Special Forms of Diabetes

  • C-peptide is valuable in identifying Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA), which presents clinically like type 2 diabetes but with positive pancreatic autoantibodies and lower C-peptide levels 4
  • Persistent C-peptide is an important feature of Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY), helping identify patients who may be misdiagnosed as type 1 diabetes 4

4. Risk Assessment and Monitoring

  • Low C-peptide levels are associated with:
    • Increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications
    • Poorer glycemic control
    • Higher risk of severe hypoglycemia 1
  • C-peptide levels may predict clinical partial remission during the first year of type 1 diabetes 4

Optimal Testing Approaches

When to Measure C-peptide

  • Most useful 3-5 years after diagnosis when persistence of substantial insulin secretion suggests type 2 or monogenic diabetes 2
  • Should not be measured within 2 weeks after a hyperglycemic emergency 1
  • Particularly valuable in insulin-treated patients with uncertain diabetes classification 2

Test Selection

  • Fasting C-peptide: Simple but may not discriminate well in intermediate ranges (0.13-0.36 nmol/L) 5
  • Stimulated C-peptide (e.g., glucagon stimulation test): Provides better sensitivity and practicality 6
  • Urine C-peptide:creatinine ratio: Offers a non-invasive alternative 2

Important Caveats and Pitfalls

  • C-peptide must be interpreted in the context of simultaneous glucose levels, as concurrent glucose affects interpretation 1
  • Low C-peptide alone is not diagnostic of diabetes but indicates beta cell dysfunction 1
  • C-peptide/glucose ratios or HOMA-β C-peptide calculations do not necessarily improve diagnostic accuracy over fasting C-peptide alone 5
  • While C-peptide helps differentiate diabetes types, there is a range of values (0.6-1.8 ng/mL) that may not clearly discriminate 1, 5
  • Absent C-peptide at any time confirms absolute insulin requirement regardless of apparent etiology 2
  • The presence or absence of measurable C-peptide does not predict response to intensive insulin therapy or insulin pump therapy 1

Clinical Application Algorithm

  1. For newly diagnosed diabetes with uncertain type:

    • Measure fasting C-peptide with concurrent glucose
    • Consider autoantibody testing (GAD, IA-2, ZnT8) if C-peptide is low
  2. For established diabetes with treatment challenges:

    • C-peptide <0.6 ng/mL: Implement type 1 diabetes management strategies with basal-bolus insulin
    • C-peptide 0.6-1.8 ng/mL: Consider additional testing (autoantibodies) and close monitoring with basal insulin plus oral agents
    • C-peptide >1.8 ng/mL: Focus on type 2 diabetes management strategies with non-insulin therapies
  3. For monitoring disease progression:

    • Regular reassessment of glycemic control
    • More intensive monitoring for hypoglycemia in patients with C-peptide <10 pmol/L
    • Vigilant screening for microvascular and macrovascular complications

References

Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Low C-peptide Levels

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2013

Research

C-peptide.

Diabetes care, 1982

Research

[The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in diabetology].

Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism, 2015

Research

Fasting C-peptide and Related Parameters Characterizing Insulin Secretory Capacity for Correctly Classifying Diabetes Type and for Predicting Insulin Requirement in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2016

Research

A Practical Review of C-Peptide Testing in Diabetes.

Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.