What are the neurocutaneous markers in myelopathy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Neurocutaneous markers, including café-au-lait spots, ash leaf macules, shagreen patches, angiofibromas, and port-wine stains, are crucial in identifying underlying neurological conditions associated with myelopathy, such as neurofibromatosis, tuberous sclerosis, or Sturge-Weber syndrome. When evaluating a patient with myelopathy, a thorough skin examination is essential as these cutaneous findings can suggest specific genetic disorders affecting the spinal cord. For example, multiple café-au-lait spots (six or more that are >5mm in prepubertal patients or >15mm in postpubertal patients) strongly suggest neurofibromatosis type 1, which can cause spinal cord compression through neurofibromas 1. Similarly, the presence of ash leaf macules and shagreen patches may indicate tuberous sclerosis complex, which can present with spinal cord involvement. Port-wine stains in a trigeminal distribution might suggest Sturge-Weber syndrome, which occasionally has spinal manifestations. Other relevant markers include hypopigmented streaks in incontinentia pigmenti and cutaneous hemangiomas in Cobb syndrome.

Key Neurocutaneous Markers

  • Café-au-lait spots: associated with neurofibromatosis type 1
  • Ash leaf macules: associated with tuberous sclerosis complex
  • Shagreen patches: associated with tuberous sclerosis complex
  • Angiofibromas: associated with tuberous sclerosis complex
  • Port-wine stains: associated with Sturge-Weber syndrome
  • Hypopigmented streaks: associated with incontinentia pigmenti
  • Cutaneous hemangiomas: associated with Cobb syndrome

Early recognition of these neurocutaneous markers allows for prompt neuroimaging, genetic testing, and appropriate management of the underlying condition causing myelopathy, potentially preventing progressive neurological deterioration 1.

From the Research

Neurocutaneous Markers in Myelopathy

There is limited information available on neurocutaneous markers in myelopathy. However, some studies provide insight into the diagnosis and evaluation of myelopathy:

  • The clinical evaluation and MRI spine are crucial in establishing the correct diagnosis and treatment plan for myelopathy 2.
  • Advances in diagnostic neuroimaging techniques and improved understanding of immune pathogenic mechanisms have expanded the knowledge of inflammatory and noninflammatory myelopathies 3.
  • Biomarkers of disease, such as anti-aquaporin 4 and anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies, have been identified in myelitis and other immune-related mechanisms 3.
  • Imaging observations, such as MRI "pancake" gadolinium enhancement pattern with spondylotic myelopathy and subpial enhancement with neurosarcoidosis, have improved diagnostic specificity 4.
  • Genetic markers and biomarkers have enhanced the specificity of diagnosis, and improved imaging has shown that the same cause can present more variably than previously appreciated 4.

Diagnosis and Evaluation

The diagnosis of myelopathy requires integration of clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters:

  • Clinical findings, time course, and radiographic patterns can help identify the causes of myelopathy 4.
  • Neuroimaging helps distinguish compressive etiologies that may require urgent surgery from intrinsic etiologies that generally require medical treatment 5.
  • Awareness of the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of different myelopathies is fundamental for a correct diagnosis 5.
  • A detailed history and physical examination are necessary to define the clinical syndrome, and neuroimaging is indicated in most instances of new-onset myelopathy 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Challenging Myelopathy Cases.

Seminars in neurology, 2022

Research

Clinical Approach to Myelopathy Diagnosis.

Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2024

Research

Approach to Myelopathy.

Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.), 2018

Research

Evaluation and Management of Acute Myelopathy.

Seminars in neurology, 2021

Research

Myelopathy.

Handbook of clinical neurology, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.