Guidelines for Using Cologuard (Multitarget Stool DNA Test) for Colorectal Cancer Screening
Cologuard is recommended as one of several approved colorectal cancer screening options for average-risk adults aged 45 years and older, with a recommended screening interval of every 3 years. 1, 2
Recommended Screening Age and Intervals
- Starting age: 45 years for average-risk individuals (qualified recommendation by American Cancer Society) 1
- Strong recommendation: Screening for all adults aged 50 years and older 1
- Screening interval for Cologuard: Every 3 years 1, 2
- Continue screening through: Age 75 years for those in good health with life expectancy >10 years 1
- Ages 76-85: Individualize decisions based on prior screening history, health status, and life expectancy 1
- Over age 85: Screening is discouraged 1
Cologuard Specifics
Cologuard (multitarget stool DNA test) has several important characteristics:
- Combines DNA biomarker detection (KRAS mutations, aberrant NDRG4 and BMP3 methylation) with a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) component 1
- FDA-approved as a primary screening modality for colorectal cancer 1
- Higher sensitivity than FIT alone for:
- Lower specificity than FIT (86.6% vs 94.9%) 1
Follow-Up Protocol
- All positive Cologuard results must be followed up with a diagnostic colonoscopy 1, 2
- Failure to follow up positive results with colonoscopy negates the benefits of screening 2
Comparison to Other Screening Methods
Cologuard is one of several recommended screening options:
Stool-based tests:
Direct visualization tests:
Special Considerations
- High-risk individuals: Those with a family history of colorectal cancer or advanced adenomas should begin screening earlier (age 40 or 10 years before the youngest affected relative's diagnosis) and should preferably use colonoscopy rather than Cologuard 1, 2, 3
- African Americans: Higher incidence and mortality rates warrant particular attention to screening adherence 1, 2
Advantages and Limitations of Cologuard
Advantages:
- Non-invasive, home-based collection 4
- No bowel preparation required 1
- Higher sensitivity than FIT for detecting cancer and precancerous lesions 1
- May improve screening participation among those unwilling to undergo colonoscopy 5
Limitations:
- Lower specificity than FIT (more false positives) 1
- Higher cost than annual FIT 5
- Less effective than colonoscopy for cancer prevention through polyp removal 5
- Less established evidence for mortality reduction compared to colonoscopy and FIT 5
Clinical Algorithm for Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision-Making
Assess risk level:
- Average risk: Age ≥45, no personal or significant family history
- High risk: Family history, personal history of polyps/CRC, inflammatory bowel disease
For average-risk patients:
- Offer choice between stool-based tests and direct visualization tests
- Consider patient preferences, access, and insurance coverage
- If choosing Cologuard, recommend every 3 years
For high-risk patients:
- Recommend colonoscopy as the preferred screening method
- Adjust starting age and intervals based on specific risk factors
For positive Cologuard results:
- Schedule follow-up diagnostic colonoscopy promptly
- Explain the importance of this step to complete the screening process
By following these guidelines, clinicians can appropriately incorporate Cologuard into their colorectal cancer screening protocols to help reduce colorectal cancer mortality through early detection.