Canadian C-Spine Rule Criteria for Cervical Spine Imaging
The Canadian C-Spine Rule (CCR) is a validated clinical decision tool that identifies patients who require cervical spine imaging after blunt trauma with 100% sensitivity for detecting clinically significant cervical spine injuries while reducing unnecessary imaging by approximately 38%. 1, 2
Step-by-Step Application of the Canadian C-Spine Rule
Step 1: Assess for High-Risk Factors (ANY ONE mandates imaging)
- Age ≥65 years
- Dangerous mechanism of injury:
- Fall from ≥3 feet/5 stairs
- Axial load to the head (e.g., diving)
- Motor vehicle crash with high speed, rollover, or ejection
- Bicycle collision
- Motorized recreational vehicle accident
- Paresthesias in extremities 1, 2
Step 2: If NO high-risk factors, assess for Low-Risk Factors that allow safe assessment of range of motion
- Simple rear-end motor vehicle collision
- Patient in sitting position in the emergency department
- Patient ambulatory at any time since injury
- Delayed onset of neck pain
- Absence of midline cervical spine tenderness 2, 3
Step 3: If ANY low-risk factor present, assess ability to actively rotate neck
- Can the patient actively rotate their neck 45° to the left and right?
- If YES → No imaging needed
- If NO → Imaging required 2, 4
Implementation Considerations
Advantages of the CCR
- Higher specificity than NEXUS criteria (43.4% vs 37.7%), allowing for greater reduction in unnecessary imaging 5, 6
- Validated for use by physicians, nurses, and paramedics with high reliability (kappa = 0.93) 5, 4
- Potential to reduce cervical spine immobilizations by approximately 37.7% 5
Important Caveats
- The CCR applies ONLY to alert (GCS 15) and stable trauma patients
- Patients must be ≥16 years of age
- The rule does not apply to:
Clinical Implementation Tips
- When assessing range of motion, the patient should attempt rotation ONLY AFTER determining they have at least one low-risk factor
- Range of motion should be assessed ONLY if the patient has no midline tenderness
- The 45° rotation should be attempted by the patient voluntarily (not passively by the clinician)
- Proper training is essential, as early studies showed some missed injuries when the rule was incorrectly applied 4
Comparison with NEXUS Criteria
While both the CCR and NEXUS criteria are validated tools, the CCR has demonstrated superior specificity while maintaining excellent sensitivity:
- NEXUS criteria include: absence of midline tenderness, normal alertness, no intoxication, no focal neurologic deficit, and no painful distracting injury 1
- CCR has been shown to reduce imaging rates more effectively than NEXUS (potential reduction of 43.4% vs 37.7%) 3, 6
The American College of Radiology recognizes both tools but notes the CCR's superior performance in reducing unnecessary imaging while maintaining safety 1, 2.