What is the process for a Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) scan in metastatic prostate cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

FDG PET Scan Process for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

FDG PET scans are generally not recommended for routine evaluation of metastatic prostate cancer due to their limited sensitivity, except in specific clinical scenarios such as dedifferentiated disease or castration-resistant prostate cancer. 1

Utility of FDG PET in Prostate Cancer

FDG PET has significant limitations for typical prostate adenocarcinoma:

  • Low sensitivity for well-differentiated prostate cancer due to low glucose metabolism in these tumors 2, 1
  • Poor detection of osseous metastases compared to conventional bone scintigraphy 2
  • Limited overall detection rate (only 31% in one study of patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy) 2

However, FDG PET may be useful in specific scenarios:

  • Advanced metastatic prostate cancer that has dedifferentiated or transformed to aggressive variants (e.g., small cell type) 2, 1
  • High Gleason grade tumors that convert to higher glucose metabolism 2
  • Castration-resistant disease for monitoring treatment response 1
  • Lytic bone metastases, which are rare but more FDG-avid than typical sclerotic prostate cancer metastases 3

FDG PET Scan Process

When an FDG PET scan is deemed appropriate, the process typically involves:

  1. Patient Preparation:

    • Fasting for 4-6 hours before the scan
    • Blood glucose check (should be <200 mg/dL)
    • Avoidance of strenuous exercise for 24 hours before the scan
    • Removal of metal objects and jewelry
  2. Radiotracer Administration:

    • Intravenous injection of fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)
    • FDG is a radioactive analog of glucose 2
    • Uptake period of 60-90 minutes to allow for radiotracer distribution
  3. Scanning Procedure:

    • Positioning on the scanner table
    • Scan typically covers skull base to mid-thigh 2
    • Combined PET and CT acquisition (CT for anatomical correlation and attenuation correction)
    • Scan duration of approximately 20-30 minutes
  4. Post-Scan:

    • Increased fluid intake to help eliminate radiotracer
    • Limited contact with pregnant women and young children for several hours
    • Normal activities can usually resume

Interpretation Considerations

When interpreting FDG PET in metastatic prostate cancer:

  • FDG uptake correlates with tumor differentiation - higher in poorly differentiated tumors 4
  • FDG PET may detect nodal and soft tissue metastases better than bone metastases 5
  • PSA levels may correlate with positive findings - higher PSA levels increase likelihood of positive FDG PET 6
  • Physiologic urinary excretion of FDG can obscure pelvic lesions 2

Superior Alternatives for Prostate Cancer Imaging

More appropriate imaging modalities for metastatic prostate cancer include:

  • PSMA PET/CT - superior diagnostic performance for metastatic disease 1
  • Choline PET (11C-choline or 18F-choline) - higher sensitivity than FDG PET 1
  • Fluciclovine PET (18F-fluciclovine) - superior detection compared to conventional imaging 1
  • Conventional bone scan - remains superior to FDG PET for bone metastases 1

Clinical Pitfalls

  • Relying on FDG PET as first-line imaging may miss significant disease due to low sensitivity in typical prostate adenocarcinoma
  • Urinary excretion of FDG can obscure pelvic lesions
  • FDG PET may underestimate the extent of osseous metastatic disease 5
  • False positives can occur due to inflammation, infection, or recent biopsy

In summary, while FDG PET has limited utility in typical metastatic prostate cancer, it may provide valuable information in specific clinical scenarios such as dedifferentiated disease or castration-resistant prostate cancer when other more appropriate imaging modalities have been considered.

References

Guideline

Imaging Modalities for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.