What is the Canadian Head Computed Tomography (CT) rule for minor head injury?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The Canadian CT Head Rule for Minor Head Injury

The Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) is a highly sensitive clinical decision tool that identifies patients with minor head injury who require CT scanning, with 100% sensitivity for detecting injuries requiring neurosurgical intervention while allowing for a potential reduction in CT use by approximately 37%. 1

Criteria for Application

The CCHR applies to patients with:

  • Minor head injury (GCS 13-15)
  • Loss of consciousness, amnesia, or witnessed disorientation
  • Injury within the past 24 hours 1

The rule does not apply to patients with:

  • Unstable vital signs
  • Obvious skull fracture
  • Seizure after injury
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulant use
  • Focal neurologic deficits
  • Age under 16 years 1

High-Risk Criteria (100% sensitive for neurosurgical intervention)

CT scan is recommended for patients with any of these five high-risk factors:

  1. Failure to reach GCS of 15 within 2 hours of injury
  2. Suspected open skull fracture
  3. Any sign of basal skull fracture
  4. Vomiting more than twice
  5. Age greater than 65 years 1, 2

Medium-Risk Criteria

Additional factors that increase risk of clinically important brain injury:

  1. Amnesia before impact >30 minutes
  2. Dangerous mechanism of injury (e.g., pedestrian struck by vehicle, ejection from vehicle, fall from height >3 feet or 5 stairs) 1, 2

The combination of high and medium-risk factors is 98.4% sensitive for predicting clinically important brain injury 2.

Comparison with Other Decision Rules

The CCHR has been compared to other clinical decision rules, most notably the New Orleans Criteria (NOC):

  • Sensitivity: Both rules are 100% sensitive for detecting injuries requiring neurosurgical intervention 3
  • Specificity: CCHR has higher specificity (37.2%-39.7%) compared to NOC (3.0%-5.6%) 3
  • CT Reduction: CCHR could potentially reduce CT use by approximately 37%, while NOC would only reduce CT use by about 3% 4, 3

Evidence for Expanded Use

The CCHR has been evaluated in patients with minimal head injury (no loss of consciousness or disorientation):

  • In a study of 240 patients with minimal head injury, the CCHR was 100% sensitive for detecting intracranial hemorrhage 5
  • All cases of intracranial hemorrhage occurred in patients who met either high-risk criteria (age) or medium-risk criteria (mechanism) 5
  • No patients with intracranial hemorrhage required ICU care or intervention 5

Implementation Considerations

When implementing the CCHR in clinical practice:

  • The rule was developed and validated in adult populations and should not be applied to pediatric patients 1
  • Patients on anticoagulants typically require CT scanning regardless of other criteria 1
  • Clinical judgment should still be exercised, particularly with high-risk populations or when multiple risk factors are present 1

Common Pitfalls

  • Applying the rule to patients who don't meet inclusion criteria (e.g., pediatric patients, patients on anticoagulants)
  • Failing to recognize signs of basal skull fracture (e.g., hemotympanum, raccoon eyes, Battle's sign, CSF otorrhea/rhinorrhea)
  • Not waiting the full 2 hours to assess for return to normal GCS when applicable
  • Underestimating the significance of vomiting (must be >2 episodes)
  • Overlooking dangerous mechanisms of injury when taking history

The CCHR provides an evidence-based approach to determining the need for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury, balancing the need to identify clinically significant injuries while reducing unnecessary imaging.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.