The Canadian CT Head Rule for Minor Head Injury
The Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) is a highly sensitive clinical decision tool that identifies patients with minor head injury who require CT scanning, with 100% sensitivity for detecting injuries requiring neurosurgical intervention while allowing for a potential reduction in CT use by approximately 37%. 1
Criteria for Application
The CCHR applies to patients with:
- Minor head injury (GCS 13-15)
- Loss of consciousness, amnesia, or witnessed disorientation
- Injury within the past 24 hours 1
The rule does not apply to patients with:
- Unstable vital signs
- Obvious skull fracture
- Seizure after injury
- Coagulopathy or anticoagulant use
- Focal neurologic deficits
- Age under 16 years 1
High-Risk Criteria (100% sensitive for neurosurgical intervention)
CT scan is recommended for patients with any of these five high-risk factors:
- Failure to reach GCS of 15 within 2 hours of injury
- Suspected open skull fracture
- Any sign of basal skull fracture
- Vomiting more than twice
- Age greater than 65 years 1, 2
Medium-Risk Criteria
Additional factors that increase risk of clinically important brain injury:
- Amnesia before impact >30 minutes
- Dangerous mechanism of injury (e.g., pedestrian struck by vehicle, ejection from vehicle, fall from height >3 feet or 5 stairs) 1, 2
The combination of high and medium-risk factors is 98.4% sensitive for predicting clinically important brain injury 2.
Comparison with Other Decision Rules
The CCHR has been compared to other clinical decision rules, most notably the New Orleans Criteria (NOC):
- Sensitivity: Both rules are 100% sensitive for detecting injuries requiring neurosurgical intervention 3
- Specificity: CCHR has higher specificity (37.2%-39.7%) compared to NOC (3.0%-5.6%) 3
- CT Reduction: CCHR could potentially reduce CT use by approximately 37%, while NOC would only reduce CT use by about 3% 4, 3
Evidence for Expanded Use
The CCHR has been evaluated in patients with minimal head injury (no loss of consciousness or disorientation):
- In a study of 240 patients with minimal head injury, the CCHR was 100% sensitive for detecting intracranial hemorrhage 5
- All cases of intracranial hemorrhage occurred in patients who met either high-risk criteria (age) or medium-risk criteria (mechanism) 5
- No patients with intracranial hemorrhage required ICU care or intervention 5
Implementation Considerations
When implementing the CCHR in clinical practice:
- The rule was developed and validated in adult populations and should not be applied to pediatric patients 1
- Patients on anticoagulants typically require CT scanning regardless of other criteria 1
- Clinical judgment should still be exercised, particularly with high-risk populations or when multiple risk factors are present 1
Common Pitfalls
- Applying the rule to patients who don't meet inclusion criteria (e.g., pediatric patients, patients on anticoagulants)
- Failing to recognize signs of basal skull fracture (e.g., hemotympanum, raccoon eyes, Battle's sign, CSF otorrhea/rhinorrhea)
- Not waiting the full 2 hours to assess for return to normal GCS when applicable
- Underestimating the significance of vomiting (must be >2 episodes)
- Overlooking dangerous mechanisms of injury when taking history
The CCHR provides an evidence-based approach to determining the need for CT scanning in patients with minor head injury, balancing the need to identify clinically significant injuries while reducing unnecessary imaging.