CT Angiography is the Best Diagnostic Test for Aortic Dissection
CT angiography (CTA) with intravenous contrast is the first-line diagnostic test for suspected aortic dissection due to its superior sensitivity (>95%) and specificity (>95%), rapid acquisition time, and widespread availability. 1
Diagnostic Imaging Options for Aortic Dissection
CT Angiography (CTA)
- Sensitivity: >95%
- Specificity: >95%
- Advantages:
- Near universal availability
- Ability to image the entire aorta (lumen, wall, and periaortic regions)
- Can identify anatomic variants and branch vessel involvement
- Can distinguish between different acute aortic syndromes (dissection, intramural hematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer)
- Short acquisition time
- Provides 3D data for surgical planning 2
- Protocol: Should include non-contrast study followed by contrast-enhanced imaging to detect subtle changes of intramural hematoma and delineate the dissection flap 2
Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
- Sensitivity: 99%
- Specificity: 89%
- Best used for: Hemodynamically unstable patients who cannot be transported for CT
- Advantages: Can be performed at bedside, provides information about cardiac function and aortic valve involvement 1, 3
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Sensitivity: approaching 100%
- Specificity: approaching 100%
- Limitations:
- Best used for: Stable patients with contrast allergy or renal dysfunction
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
- Sensitivity: 59-80% (limited, especially for descending aorta)
- Best used for: Initial bedside screening in unstable patients, but insufficient for definitive diagnosis 1, 3
Aortography (Conventional Angiography)
- Historical gold standard but now largely replaced by non-invasive techniques
- Sensitivity: 88%
- Specificity: >95%
- Limitations: Invasive procedure with inherent risks, may miss dissections with thrombosed false lumen 2
Clinical Decision Algorithm
For hemodynamically stable patients:
For hemodynamically unstable patients:
For patients with contrast allergy or renal dysfunction:
Important Considerations
- If initial imaging is negative but clinical suspicion remains high, obtain a second imaging study using a different modality 1
- A negative chest x-ray should not delay definitive aortic imaging in high-risk patients 2, 1
- ECG-gated CTA techniques can generate motion-free images of the aortic root and coronary arteries 2
- Imaging should extend from thoracic inlet to pelvis, including iliac and femoral arteries, to provide sufficient information for surgical or endovascular treatment planning 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Relying solely on transthoracic echocardiography, which has limited sensitivity, especially for the descending aorta 3
- Delaying definitive imaging in patients with high clinical suspicion
- Administering thrombolytics or anticoagulants before ruling out aortic dissection 1
- Failing to obtain non-contrast images, which are essential for detecting intramural hematoma 2
- Not considering branch vessel involvement, which affects management decisions 2, 5
In summary, while multiple imaging modalities can diagnose aortic dissection, CT angiography offers the best combination of accuracy, availability, and comprehensive evaluation, making it the diagnostic test of choice for suspected aortic dissection in most clinical scenarios.