What are the differences between Xelstrym (methylphenidate) and Daytrana (methylphenidate) in treating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differences Between Xelstrym and Daytrana: Methylphenidate Transdermal Systems for ADHD

Xelstrym and Daytrana are both methylphenidate transdermal patches for ADHD treatment, but Xelstrym offers a newer formulation with potentially improved wear characteristics and less skin irritation compared to Daytrana.

Key Similarities

Both medications:

  • Contain methylphenidate as the active ingredient
  • Are transdermal delivery systems (patches)
  • Work by blocking the reuptake of dopamine and norepinephrine 1
  • Bypass first-pass metabolism in the liver
  • Provide extended medication delivery over approximately 9 hours
  • Are FDA-approved for treating ADHD in children

Important Differences

Formulation and Technology

  • Xelstrym: Newer transdermal technology (approved more recently)
  • Daytrana: Original methylphenidate patch with more reported issues of skin irritation 2

Pharmacokinetics

  • Both patches deliver methylphenidate steadily through the skin, reaching peak plasma concentrations in approximately 8 hours 2
  • When using transdermal delivery, there are higher relative concentrations of l-threo-methylphenidate (50-60% of d-threo-methylphenidate) compared to oral formulations 3
  • This differs from oral methylphenidate where first-pass metabolism results in much lower l-isomer concentrations

Clinical Considerations

  • Skin Irritation: Daytrana has been associated with more frequent skin irritation issues, which was one of its main disadvantages 4
  • Wear Time: Both patches are designed for 9-hour wear periods, but can be removed earlier to adjust duration of effect 2
  • Onset of Action: Both patches typically have an onset of effect about 2 hours after application 4
  • Duration of Effect: Both provide symptom control for approximately 11-12 hours 4

Practical Implications

Advantages of Transdermal Systems (Both Products)

  • Eliminates the need for multiple daily doses
  • Useful for patients who have difficulty swallowing pills
  • Allows for flexible duration of treatment by removing the patch early
  • May be beneficial for patients who experience significant "peaks and valleys" with oral medications

Disadvantages

  • Skin irritation (more common with Daytrana)
  • Must remember to remove the patch
  • Visible to others when worn on exposed skin
  • Higher relative concentrations of l-threo-methylphenidate compared to oral formulations 3

Clinical Efficacy

Both Xelstrym and Daytrana have demonstrated efficacy similar to other extended-release methylphenidate formulations like OROS methylphenidate (Concerta) 4. The efficacy profile is consistent with what would be expected from methylphenidate, with significant improvements in ADHD symptoms compared to placebo 2.

Side Effect Profile

Common side effects for both medications include:

  • Decreased appetite
  • Sleep disturbances
  • Increased blood pressure and heart rate
  • Headaches
  • Irritability
  • Stomach pain 1

Patient Selection Considerations

Transdermal methylphenidate systems may be particularly useful for:

  • Adolescents with concerns about medication diversion (patches have less abuse potential than immediate-release tablets) 1
  • Patients who need flexible duration of medication effect
  • Patients who have difficulty with oral medication administration
  • Patients who experience significant fluctuations with oral formulations

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Regular monitoring of vital signs, particularly blood pressure and heart rate
  • Assessment of skin at application site for irritation
  • Monitoring of growth, weight, and appetite
  • Evaluation of sleep quality

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends considering methylphenidate as first-line therapy for ADHD due to its lower abuse potential compared to amphetamine-based medications 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.