Management of Epiphrenic Diverticulum with Abnormal High-Resolution Manometry Results
The initial management approach for a patient with epiphrenic diverticulum and abnormal high-resolution manometry (HRM) results should be a myotomy-first approach, addressing the underlying motility disorder before considering diverticulectomy.
Understanding the Pathophysiology
Epiphrenic diverticula are typically secondary to underlying esophageal motility disorders. When HRM shows abnormal results, this confirms that the diverticulum is likely a consequence of the motility disorder rather than a primary problem. The key principles of management include:
- Addressing the underlying motility disorder
- Determining if diverticulectomy is necessary
- Preventing or managing reflux
Diagnostic Evaluation
Before finalizing treatment decisions, ensure the following have been completed:
- High-resolution manometry (HRM) - already performed and abnormal
- Endoscopy - to rule out malignancy and assess for other pathology
- Barium esophagram - to determine the size and location of the diverticulum
Management Algorithm Based on HRM Findings
Step 1: Identify the Specific Motility Disorder
- Achalasia - most common association with epiphrenic diverticula
- Nutcracker esophagus
- Diffuse esophageal spasm
- Non-specific esophageal motility disorder
Step 2: Initial Management Approach
For Mild Symptoms with Small Diverticulum (<3 cm)
- Optimize medical management:
For Moderate to Severe Symptoms or Larger Diverticula
Surgical Approach:
- Myotomy-first strategy is recommended as the initial surgical approach 3
- Laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication without diverticulectomy
- This approach has shown excellent resolution of symptoms in 77-86% of patients 3
- Reserve diverticulectomy for patients with persistent symptoms after myotomy
Rationale for Myotomy-First Approach
- Safety: Diverticulectomy carries significant risk with staple line leak rates up to 27% 3
- Efficacy: Addressing the underlying motility disorder alone resolves symptoms in most patients 3, 4
- Selective approach: Only patients with persistent symptoms after myotomy need to undergo the higher-risk diverticulectomy procedure 3
Technical Considerations for Surgical Approach
Location of Diverticulum
- For diverticula <5 cm above gastroesophageal junction (GEJ): Laparoscopic approach 5
- For diverticula >5 cm above GEJ: Combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic approach may be needed 5
Critical Elements of the Procedure
- Complete myotomy is essential - incomplete myotomy is associated with substantially higher complication rates 5
- Partial fundoplication should be performed to prevent post-myotomy reflux 4, 6
Post-Procedure Management
- Monitor for complications, particularly staple line leaks if diverticulectomy is performed
- Follow-up at 2-4 weeks to assess symptom resolution
- If symptoms persist after myotomy alone, consider staged diverticulectomy 3
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Performing diverticulectomy without addressing the underlying motility disorder - This leads to high recurrence rates and persistent symptoms
- Incomplete myotomy - Associated with higher complication rates and treatment failure 5
- Failure to add anti-reflux procedure - Can lead to post-operative reflux, especially if the lower esophageal sphincter is included in the myotomy 4
- Inappropriate patient selection - Not all patients with epiphrenic diverticula require surgery; asymptomatic patients can be observed
Follow-up Recommendations
- Reassess symptoms at 4-8 weeks after initial therapy 2
- If symptoms persist after myotomy, consider:
- Repeat HRM to assess adequacy of myotomy
- Barium esophagram to evaluate for persistent obstruction
- Staged diverticulectomy if symptoms are clearly related to the diverticulum 3
The myotomy-first approach provides excellent resolution of symptoms for most patients while minimizing the risks associated with diverticulectomy, making it the preferred initial management strategy for patients with epiphrenic diverticulum and abnormal HRM results.