What imaging is recommended for an 8-month-old infant suspected of having Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Imaging for an 8-Month-Old with Suspected Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)

For an 8-month-old infant with suspected developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), pelvic radiography is the preferred initial imaging modality as it allows assessment of the femoral head ossific nucleus, proximal femur development, and bony acetabular morphology. 1

Rationale for Pelvic Radiography at 8 Months

  • By 8 months of age, the ossific nucleus of the femoral head has typically appeared in most infants (normal range 1.5-8 months), making radiographs more useful than they would be in younger infants 1
  • The American College of Radiology recommends:
    • Ultrasound for infants 4 weeks to 4 months
    • Radiograph of the pelvis for infants 4-6 months and older 2
  • At 8 months, clinical assessment alone is less reliable, and imaging is necessary to confirm diagnosis 1

Limitations of Ultrasound at This Age

  • The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) do not advocate ultrasound for DDH screening after 4-5 months 1
  • Studies show that ultrasound may overdiagnose DDH in patients 4-6 months of age, with one study finding a 40% overdiagnosis rate when compared to radiographs 1

Benefits of Radiography at This Age

  • Allows assessment of:
    • Femoral head ossific nucleus position and development
    • Proximal femur development
    • Bony acetabular morphology 1
  • Can reliably exclude DDH in children with risk factors 1
  • Reduces unnecessary follow-ups and potential iatrogenic treatment complications 1

Special Considerations

  • In dysplastic hips, the appearance of the ossific nucleus is often delayed and may appear eccentric 1
  • If the infant is currently undergoing treatment with a Pavlik harness, positioning for radiographs may be suboptimal 1
  • While a 2019 study suggested ultrasound could be an alternative to X-ray for 6-month-olds 3, current guidelines still recommend radiography as the standard of care for 8-month-old infants 1, 2

Treatment Implications of Imaging Findings

  • Imaging results will guide treatment decisions:
    • For an 8-month-old, surgical intervention may be necessary if severe dysplasia or dislocation is identified, as the Pavlik harness is most effective when applied before 6 weeks and typically only used up to 6 months of age 1, 2
    • Regular radiographic assessment will be necessary to monitor for residual dysplasia 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying solely on clinical examination at this age - limited hip abduction has variable reliability as a screening method 1
  • Using ultrasound as the primary imaging modality at 8 months - may lead to overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment 1
  • Delaying imaging - late diagnosis can lead to poorer outcomes and may require more invasive interventions 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Ultrasound Is an Alternative to X-ray for Diagnosing Developmental Dysplasia of the Hips in 6-Month-Old Children.

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.