What is the next step in managing a patient with refractory priapism (prolonged erection) who has not responded to aspiration?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Refractory Priapism

For a 52-year-old man with an 18-hour history of priapism refractory to aspiration and blood gas values indicating ischemia (pO₂ 30 mmHg, pCO₂ 60 mmHg, pH 7.25), the next step in management should be a distal glanular shunt (option D).

Rationale for Management Decision

The patient presents with clear evidence of ischemic priapism:

  • Duration of 18 hours (prolonged)
  • Refractory to initial aspiration
  • Blood gas analysis confirming hypoxia, hypercapnia, and acidosis (pO₂ ≤30 mmHg, PCO₂ ≥60 mmHg, and pH <7.25)

Stepwise Management Algorithm for Ischemic Priapism:

  1. First-line treatment (already attempted in this case):

    • Corporal aspiration with or without irrigation
    • Resolution rate approximately 30% 1
  2. Second-line treatment (should have been attempted next):

    • Intracavernosal injection of phenylephrine (100-500 μg diluted in saline)
    • Resolution rate 43-81% 2, 1
  3. Third-line treatment (current appropriate step):

    • Distal shunting procedures (distal glanular shunt)
    • Resolution rate 66-74% 1
  4. Fourth-line treatment (if distal shunt fails):

    • Proximal shunting procedures
    • Resolution rate 76-77% 1

Why Phenylephrine Injection Is Not Appropriate at This Stage

While intracavernosal phenylephrine is typically the next step after failed aspiration, research indicates that in prolonged ischemic priapism (>18 hours), phenylephrine is unlikely to be effective due to:

  1. Widespread smooth muscle cell apoptosis that prevents contractile response 3
  2. The AUA guidelines recommend proceeding to surgical shunting when pharmacologic treatments and aspiration have failed 2

Why Other Options Are Not Appropriate

  • Penile duplex Doppler ultrasound (option A): Primarily diagnostic for non-ischemic priapism; we already have blood gas confirmation of ischemic priapism 2, 1

  • Arteriography with selective embolization (option B): Treatment for non-ischemic (high-flow) priapism, not appropriate for this ischemic case 1, 4

  • Cavernosal injection of phenylephrine (option C): Already discussed; unlikely to be effective after 18 hours of ischemia 3

  • Proximal corpora-spongiosal shunt (option E): Reserved for when distal shunting fails; not first-line surgical approach 2, 1

Important Considerations

  • The patient's priapism has lasted 18 hours, which significantly increases the risk of permanent erectile dysfunction 1
  • The patient must be informed that the likelihood of erectile function recovery is low with priapism lasting over 18 hours 1
  • Monitoring for complications during and after the procedure is essential
  • Follow-up evaluation should be scheduled to assess erectile function recovery and potential need for erectile dysfunction treatments 1

In summary, given the prolonged duration of priapism (18 hours), failed initial aspiration, and blood gas values confirming ischemia, a distal glanular shunt is the most appropriate next step in management.

References

Guideline

Priapism Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.