Treatment of Mobitz Type I and II Atrioventricular Block
Permanent pacemaker implantation is the gold standard treatment for Mobitz type II AV block regardless of symptoms, while Mobitz type I (Wenckebach) typically requires pacing only when symptomatic or in specific high-risk situations. 1
Differential Management Approach
Mobitz Type II AV Block
First-line treatment: Permanent pacemaker implantation (Class I recommendation)
Acute/temporary management (while awaiting permanent pacemaker):
Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach) AV Block
Asymptomatic patients:
- Observation is generally appropriate as the block is often transient and benign 1
- Regular monitoring with ECGs and Holter monitoring
Symptomatic patients:
High-risk situations:
Pacemaker Selection
Dual chamber pacing is recommended over single chamber ventricular pacing for patients with AV block (Class I recommendation) 1
- Particularly important in patients with preexisting heart failure (significantly improved 5-year survival) 5
Single chamber ventricular pacing may be considered in:
- Patients where frequent ventricular pacing is not expected
- Those with significant comorbidities that may limit the benefit of dual chamber pacing 1
Important Clinical Considerations
Location of block matters:
- Mobitz I: Usually within the AV node (typically more benign)
- Mobitz II: Almost always below the AV node (higher risk of progression to complete heart block) 6
Diagnostic evaluation before pacing:
Special populations:
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Misdiagnosis: Ensure proper differentiation between Mobitz I and II, as management differs significantly
- Delayed treatment: Don't delay permanent pacing for Mobitz II even in asymptomatic patients
- Overreliance on atropine: Remember it's often ineffective in Mobitz II block
- Inadequate monitoring: Even asymptomatic Mobitz I patients require regular follow-up
- Inappropriate pacemaker selection: Consider dual chamber pacing for most patients, especially those with heart failure
Remember that Mobitz II is never considered a normal physiologic finding and always warrants permanent pacing, while Mobitz I requires a more nuanced approach based on symptoms and risk factors.