Non-Contrast CT is Superior to Contrast-Enhanced CT for Visualizing Intracranial Hemorrhage
Non-contrast head CT is the gold standard and first-line imaging test for detecting acute intracranial hemorrhage, while contrast-enhanced CT may actually obscure subtle hemorrhages and is not recommended as the initial imaging study. 1
Imaging Characteristics and Detection Capabilities
Non-Contrast CT
- Highly sensitive for acute hemorrhage detection
- Rapid acquisition time (critical in emergency situations)
- Effectively identifies location, size, and mass effect of hemorrhages
- Acute hemorrhages appear hyperdense (50-100 Hounsfield units)
- Recommended by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Heart Association/American Stroke Association 1
Contrast-Enhanced CT
- Not recommended as first-line imaging for acute intracranial hemorrhage
- May obscure subtle hemorrhages due to contrast enhancement
- Should only be used after hemorrhage has been identified on non-contrast CT
- Primarily indicated to evaluate underlying structural lesions (e.g., suspected metastatic disease) when MRI is not feasible 1
Clinical Decision Algorithm
Initial Presentation: Patient with suspected intracranial hemorrhage
- First imaging study: Non-contrast head CT
- Rationale: Highest sensitivity for acute hemorrhage without risk of obscuring blood
If hemorrhage identified on non-contrast CT:
- Consider CT angiography (CTA) if vascular abnormality suspected
- CTA has >90% sensitivity and specificity compared to catheter arteriography 1
- "CTA spot sign" may help predict hematoma expansion
If additional information needed after hemorrhage identification:
- Consider contrast-enhanced CT to evaluate underlying structural lesions
- Consider MRI with gradient echo (GRE) or T2* susceptibility-weighted imaging for better characterization
If non-contrast CT negative but clinical suspicion remains high:
- Proceed to MRI with GRE or T2* susceptibility-weighted imaging
- MRI is more sensitive for small bleeds, particularly in posterior fossa or brainstem 1
Important Pitfalls to Avoid
- Critical Error: Administering contrast before initial non-contrast CT can obscure hemorrhage and lead to missed diagnosis 1
- Small hemorrhages, especially in the posterior fossa, may be missed on non-contrast CT and require MRI for detection 1
- Other pathologic processes can mimic hemorrhage on CT (calcifications, vascular malformations, highly cellular tumors) 2
- Dual-energy CT can help separate hemorrhage from other causes of hyperattenuation, but has limited availability 2
Special Considerations
- For subacute and chronic hemorrhages, MRI is more sensitive than CT 1
- When cerebral venous thrombosis is suspected as a cause of hemorrhage, CT venography (CTV) or MR venography (MRV) is indicated 1
- Patients with thicker acute subdural hematomas, lower hemoglobin levels, and higher leukocyte counts require closer observation due to higher risk of requiring delayed surgical intervention 1