What is the study, possibly the TRIMASTER trial, that compared a triple therapy regimen of metformin, a thiazolidinedione (TZD), and another oral hypoglycemic agent to the standard American Diabetes Association (ADA) approach for managing type 2 diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The ADOPT Trial: Comparing Metformin, TZD, and Sulfonylureas for Type 2 Diabetes Management

The study you are referring to is the ADOPT (A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial) study, which was led by Dr. Ralph DeFronzo and compared metformin, rosiglitazone (a thiazolidinedione/TZD), and glyburide (a sulfonylurea) as initial monotherapy for type 2 diabetes. 1

Key Features of the ADOPT Trial

  • Design: Long-term, randomized controlled trial comparing three oral antidiabetic medications as monotherapy
  • Principal Investigator: Dr. Ralph DeFronzo (not Doranzo) was a key investigator
  • Medications Studied:
    • Metformin (a biguanide)
    • Rosiglitazone (a thiazolidinedione/TZD)
    • Glyburide (a sulfonylurea)
  • Primary Outcome: Time to monotherapy failure (defined as fasting plasma glucose >180 mg/dL)

Main Findings of ADOPT

The ADOPT trial demonstrated several important findings that have influenced diabetes management:

  1. Durability of Glycemic Control: Rosiglitazone provided more durable glycemic control compared to both metformin and glyburide, with the lowest rate of monotherapy failure 1

  2. Comparative Effects on HbA1c:

    • All three medications initially reduced HbA1c to similar degrees
    • Over time, glycemic control deteriorated most rapidly with glyburide, followed by metformin, and least with rosiglitazone 1
  3. Side Effect Profiles:

    • Weight effects: Metformin was associated with weight loss, while rosiglitazone and glyburide were associated with weight gain 1
    • Hypoglycemia: Significantly higher with glyburide compared to metformin or rosiglitazone 1
    • Edema and fracture risk: Higher with rosiglitazone 1

Clinical Implications from ADOPT

The ADOPT trial provided important evidence that influenced ADA guidelines and clinical practice:

  • Metformin remained first-line therapy despite not having the most durable glycemic effect, due to its weight neutrality, low hypoglycemia risk, and potential cardiovascular benefits 1

  • TZDs demonstrated superior durability in maintaining glycemic control but had significant side effects including weight gain, fluid retention, and increased fracture risk 1

  • Sulfonylureas showed the fastest deterioration in glycemic control, suggesting limitations in their ability to preserve beta-cell function long-term 1

Important Distinctions

The ADOPT trial should not be confused with:

  1. The TODAY trial - which studied treatment options for youth with type 2 diabetes 1
  2. The TriMaster trial - which is a more recent crossover study examining DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones as second or third-line therapy 2

Clinical Relevance Today

While the ADOPT trial was groundbreaking, it's important to note that:

  • Rosiglitazone use became restricted due to cardiovascular safety concerns after the trial
  • Newer medication classes (SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists) have emerged with proven cardiovascular and renal benefits
  • Current guidelines still recommend metformin as first-line therapy, with subsequent medication choices based on comorbidities and patient factors 1

The ADOPT trial remains a landmark study that demonstrated the importance of considering medication durability in addition to short-term efficacy when managing type 2 diabetes.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.