Is Total Posterior Solution (TOPS) considered an experimental or investigational procedure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Total Posterior Solution (TOPS): Experimental and Investigational Status

The Total Posterior Solution (TOPS) System is currently considered experimental and investigational in the United States, as it has not yet received full FDA approval and is still undergoing clinical trials.

Current Status and Evidence

The TOPS System represents a novel approach to treating lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Unlike traditional fusion procedures, TOPS is designed as a dynamic posterior arthroplasty device that:

  • Replaces the facet joints after decompression
  • Maintains segmental motion and flexibility
  • Provides multiaxial, three-column stabilization
  • Aims to reduce adjacent segment degeneration

Regulatory Status

  • United States: Currently under investigation through FDA IDE (Investigational Device Exemption) trials 1
  • Europe: Has received regulatory approval for use 2

Clinical Evidence

Recent high-quality evidence from a 2023 prospective, randomized controlled multicenter FDA IDE trial showed promising results:

  • 249 patients (170 TOPS vs. 79 TLIF)
  • Higher composite clinical success with TOPS (85%) compared to TLIF (64%) (p=0.0138)
  • Greater percentage of patients achieving minimum 15-point ODI improvement with TOPS (93%) vs. TLIF (81%) (p=0.037)
  • Lower surgical reintervention rate with TOPS (5.9%) vs. TLIF (8.8%)
  • Maintenance of flexion/extension range of motion from preoperatively (3.85°) to 24 months (3.86°) 1

Earlier studies have also shown positive outcomes:

  • A 2007 prospective pilot study of 29 patients showed 41% improvement in ODI scores and 76mm improvement in VAS pain scores at 1 year 3
  • A 2022 case series demonstrated an average 81% improvement in pain scores at an average follow-up of 51 months 4

Implications for Clinical Practice

Despite promising results, several factors support the experimental classification:

  1. Limited long-term data: Most studies have follow-up periods of 24 months or less
  2. Ongoing clinical trials: The device is still being evaluated in FDA-sanctioned studies
  3. Absence in major guidelines: No major spine surgery guidelines currently recommend TOPS as standard of care
  4. Limited comparative studies: Few studies directly compare TOPS to established treatments

Patient Selection Considerations

If considering this technology in settings where it may be available:

  • Best candidates appear to be those with single-level lumbar stenosis with grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis 1
  • Patients seeking to maintain segmental motion and avoid fusion
  • Those concerned about adjacent segment disease risk with traditional fusion

Conclusion

While the TOPS System shows promise as an alternative to fusion for treating lumbar stenosis with spondylolisthesis, its current status remains experimental and investigational in the United States. Patients should be informed about the investigational nature of this device and the limited long-term data available on its safety and efficacy.

Related Questions

Is surgical intervention, including decompression and fusion, recommended for a 59-year-old male patient with spinal stenosis, facet arthropathy, and chronic low back pain, who has failed conservative management and presents with numbness, weakness, and gait disturbances?
Is L3-S1 laminectomy and fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation, stabilization L4-S1 with PEEK (Polyetheretherketone) interbody cages at L4-5 and L5-S1, and posterolateral fusion L3-S1 medically indicated for a patient with spinal stenosis of the lumbar region with neurogenic claudication?
Is arthrodesis, posterior non-segmental instrumentation, and spinal bone autograft (Spinal Bone Graft) medically indicated for a patient with lumbar spinal stenosis L4-5 and degenerative spondylolisthesis, who has low back pain radiating to the right leg, interfering with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and work, and had relief from a transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection (ESI)?
Is inpatient level of care medically necessary for a patient with symptomatic severe stenosis and severe facet arthropathy at L3-4 and L4-5 undergoing lumbar laminectomy with fusion?
What is the correct dosification of Amlodipine (calcium channel blocker) for adults with hypertension?
What is the correct dosing for Losartan (Angiotensin II receptor antagonist) in adults with hypertension or diabetic nephropathy?
What is the treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in the urine?
What are the next steps in managing a patient with leukopenia?
What is the recommended treatment approach for a male patient with low testosterone (hypogonadism) and osteoporosis?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.