What is the recommended approach for assessing an individual with concerns for changes in cognition, personality, or behavior and evaluating the capacities of a committed relationship to cope with progressive neurological conditions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Assessment of Cognitive, Personality, and Behavioral Changes in Progressive Neurological Conditions

A comprehensive multi-tiered evaluation involving both the patient and care partner is essential for accurately assessing cognitive, personality, or behavioral changes and evaluating a relationship's capacity to cope with progressive neurological conditions. 1

Initial Assessment Framework

Patient-Centered Evaluation

  1. Establish a partnership with both patient and care partner 1

    • Develop shared goals for the evaluation process
    • Assess capacity to engage in the goal-setting process
    • Include both patient and care partner in all aspects of assessment 1
  2. Cognitive Assessment Tools 1

    • Brief screening tools for initial assessment:

      • Mini-Cog
      • Clock Drawing Test (CDT)
      • Memory Impairment Screen (MIS)
      • Four-item version of MoCA (Clock-drawing, Tap-at-letter-A, Orientation, Delayed-recall)
    • Comprehensive assessment tools when more time is available:

      • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) - preferred for mild cognitive impairment
      • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) - better for moderate dementia
      • Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination
      • Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS)
  3. Neurological Examination 2

    • Assess level of consciousness, pupillary responses
    • Evaluate strength, tone, coordination in all extremities
    • Test deep tendon reflexes and pathological reflexes
    • Observe for ataxia, asymmetry, or abnormal movement patterns

Care Partner/Informant Assessment

  1. Standardized Informant Tools 1

    • For cognitive changes:

      • Everyday Cognition (ECog)
      • Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8)
      • Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE)
    • For functional changes:

      • Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ)
      • Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)
      • Lawton-Brody IADL scale
      • Amsterdam IADL questionnaire
    • For behavioral/personality changes:

      • Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-Q)
      • Mild Behavioral Impairment Checklist (MBI-C)
      • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for mood changes
  2. Relationship Capacity Assessment

    • While not explicitly covered in standard guidelines, assessment should include:
      • Care partner's understanding of the condition and its progression
      • Available support systems and resources
      • Care partner's own health status and coping mechanisms
      • Relationship dynamics before and after symptom onset

Advanced Assessment Considerations

When to Refer for Neuropsychological Evaluation

Neuropsychological evaluation is indicated when: 1

  • Office-based cognitive assessment is not sufficiently informative
  • Patient reports concerning symptoms but performs normally on basic testing
  • There are confounding factors such as:
    • High premorbid intelligence
    • Cultural/language barriers
    • Educational differences
    • Sensory difficulties
    • Psychiatric comorbidities

Benefits of Neuropsychological Assessment 1

  • Provides comprehensive assessment across cognitive domains
  • Helps determine extent of cognitive change over time
  • Offers tailored recommendations for:
    • Compensating for specific impairments
    • Home safety and driving evaluations
    • Activity of daily living accommodations
  • Assists family in understanding patient's level of impairment
  • Guides planning for future care needs

Longitudinal Assessment

  • Serial cognitive assessments improve diagnostic accuracy 1
  • Consider follow-up evaluations:
    • Annually if abnormalities are detected 1
    • Every 1-2 years for monitoring progression
    • When new symptoms emerge or existing symptoms worsen

Diagnostic Disclosure and Care Planning

  1. Structured Communication Process 1

    • Honestly and compassionately inform both patient and care partner about:
      • Name, characteristics, and severity of the cognitive-behavioral syndrome
      • Likely underlying disease(s)
      • Disease stage and expected progression
      • Treatment options and expectations
      • Safety concerns
  2. Relationship-Focused Planning

    • Assess which activities of daily living require assistance
    • Suggest accommodations to support maximal functioning
    • Provide recommendations for home safety
    • Connect to community resources and support services
    • Discuss advance care planning appropriate to stage of illness

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying solely on cognitive screening without functional assessment 1
  • Failing to include a reliable informant in the assessment process 1
  • Overlooking behavioral and personality changes as early indicators 3
  • Misinterpreting drug-induced findings or psychiatric symptoms 2
  • Neglecting to assess the care partner's needs and coping abilities 4
  • Inadequate documentation of neurological examinations 2
  • Failing to perform serial examinations to detect changes over time 2

By implementing this comprehensive approach to assessment, clinicians can better support both the individual with cognitive, personality, or behavioral changes and their care partner through the challenges of progressive neurological conditions.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Neurological Examination Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Assessment of mood, affect, and personality.

Clinics in geriatric medicine, 1989

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.