Is the wellness industry becoming too exclusive and elitist?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

The Wellness Industry is Becoming Increasingly Elitist, Creating Significant Health Equity Gaps

Yes, the wellness industry is becoming too exclusive and elitist, creating significant health disparities that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. 1 Evidence shows that wellness programs and trends often fail to address the needs of economically challenged, less educated, and underserved populations, contributing to widening health equity gaps.

Current State of Wellness Accessibility

Disparities in Access

  • Only 0.5% of U.S. firms have 500+ employees, yet these larger companies employ 51% of workers and are much more likely to offer comprehensive wellness programs 1
  • Striking industry disparities exist: manufacturing and business services offer wellness programs at rates of 8.7% and 8.3% respectively, while other sectors like transportation (2.9%), finance (2.4%), and agriculture (1.4%) lag significantly behind 1
  • Small employers face substantial barriers including:
    • Lack of central human resources functions
    • Prohibitive costs of hiring health promotion staff
    • No financial incentive through reduced insurance premiums 1

Financial and Cultural Barriers

  • The financial burden of purchasing, implementing, and maintaining health technology creates access barriers for underresourced providers who frequently serve lower socioeconomic patients 1
  • Trust issues and lack of cultural relevance negatively impact adoption and usage rates among historically underserved populations 1
  • Research shows that after introducing financial incentives in wellness programs, disparities widened - Asians were 3% more likely and African Americans 3% less likely to receive wellness rewards than whites and non-Hispanics 2

Impact on Vulnerable Populations

Socioeconomic Factors

  • Lower-income, less-educated, and lower-job-status employees face a higher burden of cardiovascular disease and other health conditions 1
  • These employees often experience additional workplace challenges including:
    • Higher levels of job stress and insecurity
    • Long working hours
    • Sedentary work
    • Work scheduling issues and shift work 1

Women in the Workplace

  • Women face unique wellness challenges including balancing pregnancy, family responsibilities, and health transitions like menopause 1
  • Time pressures are significant: 77% of single mothers, 60% of married mothers with children under 6, and 76.8% of married mothers with school-aged children are in the workforce 1
  • Even in healthcare settings where employees should be well-educated about health, studies found women had undiagnosed hypertension, abnormal lipid profiles, glucose intolerance, and obesity 1

Minority Populations

  • Culturally sensitive and appropriate programs are essential but often lacking for minority and underserved populations 3
  • Unhealthy workers, who would benefit most from wellness initiatives, tend to be the least likely to participate in health promotion activities 3

Business Models and Incentives

Shifting Value Propositions

  • The wellness industry is expanding and becoming increasingly diverse and competitive, with new technology-focused enterprises entering the market 4
  • The value proposition is shifting from return on investment (ROI) to "value on investment" (VOI) 4
  • Many employer wellness programs are "negative wellness" approaches that reduce effective wages of sick employees rather than making true investments in workforce health 5

Recommendations for Addressing Equity Gaps

Program Design

  • Wellness programs must address the needs of all employees regardless of gender, age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, culture, job type, or physical/intellectual capacity 1
  • Programs should be culturally sensitive and all-inclusive, with targeted interventions specifically designed for vulnerable populations 1
  • Workplaces should incorporate policies supporting:
    • Child care
    • Elder/dependent care
    • Telecommuting
    • Flexible work schedules 1

Technology Implementation

  • Technology type should be carefully chosen based on specific population needs (e.g., telemedicine for rural populations, mobile phones for African American populations) 1
  • Participatory approaches should be used when evaluating technologies, with metrics related to access, usability, perceived usefulness, and cultural appropriateness 1
  • Social media and other emerging technologies should be examined as potential methods to reach historically underserved populations 1

Employer and Policy Approaches

  • Federal and state governments should encourage employers to offer comprehensive wellness programs through tax incentives 1
  • Employers should reduce barriers to participation by:
    • Offering on-site health promotion services
    • Providing healthy food choices
    • Allowing paid time during workdays for exercise and health screenings 1
  • Federal law limits targeting wellness financial incentives by subgroups, so employers should focus on culturally appropriate outreach and messaging 2

The wellness industry's current trajectory is creating concerning equity gaps that could worsen health disparities. Without intentional efforts to make wellness more inclusive and accessible, these trends will continue to benefit primarily those with existing advantages while leaving vulnerable populations further behind.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Wellness Programs With Financial Incentives Through Disparities Lens.

American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2018

Research

I'll be gone, you'll be gone: why American employers underinvest in health.

Journal of health politics, policy and law, 2014

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.