Management of Infiltrative Cardiomyopathy with Recurrent NSVT
For a patient with infiltrative cardiomyopathy, recurrent nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), elevated troponin, and abnormal ECG but normal coronary angiogram and preserved LVEF (50-55%), a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (life vest) is reasonable as a bridge to definitive risk assessment and treatment.
Risk Assessment
The patient presents with several concerning features that require careful evaluation:
- Infiltrative cardiomyopathy (structural heart disease)
- Recurrent episodes of NSVT
- Elevated troponin (indicating myocardial injury)
- Abnormal ECG
- Preserved LVEF (50-55%)
- Normal coronary angiogram
Risk Stratification Considerations
- The presence of NSVT in patients with structural heart disease significantly increases the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) 1
- Infiltrative cardiomyopathies (such as cardiac sarcoidosis, amyloidosis) are associated with higher arrhythmic risk even with preserved LVEF 2
- Elevated troponin suggests ongoing myocardial injury, which may increase arrhythmic risk
- The European Society of Cardiology guidelines note that recurrent VT/VF may require specialized treatment including catheter ablation followed by ICD implantation 2
Management Recommendations
Immediate Management
Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (life vest):
- Reasonable as a temporary protective measure while completing risk assessment 2
- The 2025 ACC/AHA guidelines state: "In patients early after MI, usefulness of a temporary wearable cardioverter-defibrillator is uncertain in patients with an LVEF ≤35% to improve survival" (Class IIb) 2
- While this recommendation specifically addresses post-MI patients, the principle applies to our patient with infiltrative cardiomyopathy and recurrent NSVT
Medical therapy:
Further Evaluation
Identify specific infiltrative cardiomyopathy type:
- Cardiac MRI with late gadolinium enhancement to assess for scar burden
- Consider endomyocardial biopsy if etiology remains unclear
Electrophysiologic evaluation:
- Consider electrophysiologic study to assess inducibility of sustained ventricular arrhythmias
- Note: The 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines state that for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, "An invasive electrophysiological study with programmed ventricular stimulation should not be performed for risk stratification" (Class III: No Benefit) 2
- However, this may be considered for other infiltrative cardiomyopathies
Definitive Management
ICD consideration:
- ICD implantation is reasonable for patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and evidence of myocardial scar, even with preserved LVEF (>35%) 2
- The 2008 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines state: "ICD implantation is reasonable for patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, giant cell myocarditis, or Chagas disease" (Class IIa) 2
- For other infiltrative cardiomyopathies, ICD decisions should be based on specific etiology and risk factors
Specialized referral:
- Referral to centers with expertise in managing complex arrhythmias and infiltrative cardiomyopathies 2
Important Considerations
- The preserved LVEF (50-55%) would typically not qualify for primary prevention ICD based on ejection fraction criteria alone
- However, the specific etiology of infiltrative cardiomyopathy may warrant ICD regardless of LVEF
- Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator provides temporary protection during evaluation period
- The combination of structural heart disease, recurrent NSVT, elevated troponin, and abnormal ECG suggests increased arrhythmic risk despite preserved LVEF
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not dismiss arrhythmic risk based solely on preserved LVEF
- Do not delay temporary protection while completing diagnostic workup
- Avoid relying solely on antiarrhythmic drugs for long-term management of high-risk patients
- Remember that some infiltrative cardiomyopathies (particularly cardiac sarcoidosis) can have high arrhythmic risk despite relatively preserved systolic function
In summary, a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator is reasonable as a bridge to definitive therapy while completing the diagnostic evaluation and risk stratification for this patient with infiltrative cardiomyopathy and recurrent NSVT.