Treatment Options for Atrial Flutter
For atrial flutter management, catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus is the most effective treatment option with >90% success rate for typical flutter and should be considered first-line therapy for recurrent or symptomatic atrial flutter. 1
Acute Management
Unstable Patients
- Immediate synchronized cardioversion is recommended for patients who are hemodynamically unstable with hypotension, ongoing ischemia, or heart failure (Class I recommendation) 2, 1
- Lower energy levels are typically effective for atrial flutter compared to atrial fibrillation 1
Stable Patients - Rate Control
- IV diltiazem (0.25 mg/kg IV bolus over 2 min, then 5-15 mg/h) is first-line for acute rate control due to superior efficacy 1, 3
- In a comparative study, diltiazem achieved target heart rate (<100 bpm) in 95.8% of patients vs. 46.4% with metoprolol at 30 minutes 3
- Alternative rate control options:
Stable Patients - Rhythm Control
- Electrical cardioversion is highly effective (Class I recommendation) 2, 1
- Pharmacological cardioversion options:
- Important caution: Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) can cause 1:1 AV conduction during atrial flutter, requiring concomitant AV nodal blocking agents 2, 1, 4, 5
Anticoagulation
- Apply the same anticoagulation criteria as for atrial fibrillation 2, 1
- For atrial flutter duration ≥48 hours or unknown, anticoagulation is recommended for at least 3 weeks before and 4 weeks after cardioversion 1
- Alternative: TEE-guided cardioversion if no anticoagulation for preceding 3 weeks 1
Long-term Management
Rate Control Options
- Oral beta blockers, diltiazem, or verapamil are first-line for long-term rate control (Class I recommendation) 2, 1
- Rate control is often more difficult in atrial flutter than in atrial fibrillation 1
Rhythm Control Options
Catheter ablation:
- First-line therapy for recurrent or symptomatic atrial flutter 1
90% success rate for typical cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter 1, 6
- Reasonable for non-CTI-dependent flutter after failure of at least one antiarrhythmic drug 2
- Benefits include prevention of tachycardia-mediated cardiomyopathy and avoidance of long-term medication toxicity 1
Antiarrhythmic medications:
- Amiodarone, dofetilide, or sotalol can be useful to maintain sinus rhythm (Class IIa) 2, 1
- Flecainide or propafenone may be considered in patients without structural heart disease (Class IIb) 2, 4, 5
- Critical warning: When using flecainide or propafenone, always co-administer AV nodal blocking drugs to prevent rapid 1:1 conduction 2, 4, 5
AV nodal ablation with permanent pacing:
- Consider when pharmacological therapy fails and rhythm control is not achievable 1
Special Considerations
- Avoid calcium channel blockers and beta blockers in patients with pre-excitation syndromes (WPW) 1
- Avoid Class IC agents (flecainide, propafenone) in patients with structural heart disease due to increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias 5
- Flecainide is contraindicated in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation 5
- Long-term anticoagulation should be based on thromboembolic risk profile even after successful ablation 1
Treatment Algorithm
- Assess hemodynamic stability
- If unstable → immediate cardioversion
- If stable → choose rate control strategy (diltiazem/beta blockers) or rhythm control strategy
- For long-term management → consider catheter ablation as first-line therapy
- If ablation not feasible → choose appropriate antiarrhythmic medication based on cardiac structure
- Implement appropriate anticoagulation strategy based on risk factors