What are the diagnostic criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Criteria for Ankylosing Spondylitis

The diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis requires a combination of clinical features, laboratory testing, and imaging findings, with sacroiliitis on imaging plus at least one spondyloarthritis feature being the most definitive diagnostic approach. 1

Clinical Criteria

The clinical assessment focuses on identifying inflammatory back pain characteristics:

  • Age of onset < 45 years
  • Symptoms lasting > 3 months
  • Morning stiffness > 30 minutes
  • Pain at night/early morning
  • Improvement with exercise but not rest
  • Alternating buttock pain 2, 1

Additional clinical features that support the diagnosis:

  • Limitation of lumbar spine motion in sagittal and frontal planes
  • Limitation of chest expansion relative to normal values for age and sex
  • Peripheral arthritis
  • Enthesitis (inflammation at insertion of tendons/ligaments into bone) 1

Laboratory Testing

  • HLA-B27: Most valuable laboratory test with 90-95% sensitivity in AS patients

    • Likelihood ratio of 9
    • Post-test probability of 32% when positive
    • Only 3 HLA-B27 positive patients with chronic low back pain need to be seen by a rheumatologist to diagnose one case 2, 1
  • Inflammatory markers:

    • ESR/CRP have limited sensitivity (only 50%)
    • Normal values do not rule out AS 2, 1
    • Should not be relied upon exclusively for diagnosis

Imaging Criteria

Radiography

  • First-line imaging modality 2, 1
  • Sacroiliitis grading:
    • Grade 2 bilaterally OR
    • Grade 3 or higher unilaterally 2, 1
  • Limitations: Low sensitivity for early disease, changes may lag behind symptoms by 7+ years 2, 3

MRI

  • Recommended when radiographs are negative but clinical suspicion remains high 2, 1
  • Should include:
    • T1-weighted sequences
    • Fat-suppressed fluid-sensitive sequences (T2-weighted fat-suppressed or STIR) 1
  • Bone marrow edema on MRI is the hallmark of active sacroiliitis 1
  • Allows identification of "pre-radiographic" spondyloarthropathy 2, 4, 5

CT

  • May be helpful when radiographs are equivocal
  • Better for detecting subtle erosions and reparative changes
  • Higher radiation exposure limits routine use 2, 1

Formal Diagnostic Criteria

Modified New York Criteria (1984)

Requires radiological criterion plus at least one clinical criterion:

  • Radiological criterion: Sacroiliitis grade ≥2 bilaterally or grade ≥3 unilaterally
  • Clinical criteria (at least one):
    • Low back pain for ≥3 months, improved by exercise but not relieved by rest
    • Limitation of lumbar spine motion
    • Limitation of chest expansion 1, 5

ASAS Classification Criteria for Axial Spondyloarthritis

For patients with back pain ≥3 months and age of onset <45 years:

Pathway 1: Sacroiliitis on imaging plus ≥1 SpA feature

  • Imaging: MRI showing active inflammation or radiographs showing sacroiliitis

Pathway 2: HLA-B27 positive plus ≥2 other SpA features

  • SpA features include:
    • Inflammatory back pain
    • Arthritis
    • Enthesitis
    • Uveitis
    • Dactylitis
    • Psoriasis
    • Inflammatory bowel disease
    • Good response to NSAIDs
    • Family history of SpA
    • HLA-B27 positivity
    • Elevated CRP 1, 5

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Initial screening: Assess for inflammatory back pain characteristics in patients with chronic back pain (>3 months) with onset before age 45
  2. Laboratory testing: Order HLA-B27 and inflammatory markers (ESR/CRP)
  3. Initial imaging: Radiographs of sacroiliac joints
  4. If radiographs negative but clinical suspicion remains high: Order MRI of sacroiliac joints
  5. Apply diagnostic criteria: Use Modified New York or ASAS criteria based on available findings
  6. Refer to rheumatologist: For confirmation of diagnosis and management 2, 1

Common Pitfalls in Diagnosis

  • Delayed diagnosis (average 7-10 years from symptom onset) 1, 4
  • Over-reliance on radiographs which miss early disease 2, 3
  • Ignoring inflammatory back pain patterns 1
  • Over-reliance on inflammatory markers (normal levels don't rule out AS) 1
  • Referring to inappropriate specialists instead of rheumatologists 1
  • Failure to recognize extra-articular manifestations (uveitis, psoriasis, IBD) 1

Early diagnosis is crucial as newer treatments like TNF-α inhibitors are more effective when started early in the disease course 4, 3.

References

Guideline

Ankylosing Spondylitis Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Ankylosing spondylitis: an overview.

Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.