What are the radiographic findings of tuberculosis of the spine?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Radiographic Findings of Tuberculosis of the Spine

MRI is the gold standard imaging modality for diagnosing spinal tuberculosis, with characteristic findings including destruction of contiguous vertebrae and their endplates, spread along the anterior longitudinal ligament, disc involvement with paraspinal abscess formation, and less commonly, isolated spondylitis without disc involvement. 1

Key Imaging Modalities and Their Findings

MRI Findings

MRI is the most sensitive and specific imaging modality for spinal tuberculosis with a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 94% 1. Key findings include:

  • Vertebral Body Involvement:

    • Destruction of two or more contiguous vertebrae and their opposed endplates
    • Marrow edema appearing as hypointense on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images
    • T1-weighted sequences are more sensitive than T2-weighted sequences for demonstrating inflammatory processes in tuberculous vertebral bodies 1
  • Disc Space Involvement:

    • Disc infection with or without paraspinal mass
    • Disc space narrowing in later stages
  • Paraspinal/Epidural Extension:

    • Subligamentous spread along the anterior longitudinal ligament
    • Paraspinal abscess formation ("cold abscess") with peripheral enhancement on contrast-enhanced images
    • Epidural extension causing spinal cord compression
    • Best visualized on gadolinium-enhanced MRI sequences 1
  • Patterns of Involvement:

    • Four common patterns: paradiscal (most common), central, anterior subligamentous, and posterior (rare) 2
    • Posterior vertebral arch involvement is uncommon 3

Plain Radiography Findings

Plain radiographs have limited utility in early disease but may show:

  • Disc space narrowing
  • Vertebral endplate erosion
  • Paraspinal soft tissue changes
  • Anterior wedging leading to kyphosis and gibbus deformity
  • These changes typically lag 3-6 weeks behind clinical symptoms 1

CT Findings

CT provides better bony detail than MRI:

  • Bony destruction and fragmentation
  • Calcification within abscess
  • Vertebral collapse
  • Sequestrum formation
  • Better visualization of posterior elements when involved 3

Nuclear Medicine Studies

  • 3-Phase Bone Scan: Moderate-to-high sensitivity (81.4%) but low specificity (40.7%) 1
  • Gallium Scan: Less sensitive (73%) but more specific (61%) than bone scan 1
  • FDG-PET/CT: Increased uptake at infection sites with elevated SUV max; useful for monitoring treatment response 2

Distinguishing Features from Other Spinal Infections

Tuberculous spondylitis differs from pyogenic spondylitis by:

  1. More extensive bone destruction
  2. Relative preservation of disc space until later stages
  3. Larger paraspinal abscesses with thin, smooth walls
  4. Subligamentous spread across multiple vertebral levels
  5. Less prominent reactive sclerosis
  6. Calcification within abscess (pathognomonic) 1, 4

Imaging Recommendations for Suspected Spinal TB

  1. Initial Imaging:

    • MRI without and with IV contrast of the affected spinal region is the first-line imaging modality 1
    • Plain radiographs may be obtained but have limited sensitivity in early disease 1
  2. When MRI is Contraindicated:

    • CT of the spine followed by CT myelography if needed
    • Combined Gallium-67 and Tc-99m-MDP bone scan (sensitivity 73%, specificity 81%) 1
  3. For Treatment Monitoring:

    • MRI to assess healing signs: bony ankylosis, resolution of marrow edema, decreased contrast enhancement, and fatty changes within bone marrow 2
    • PET-CT shows promise for response assessment 2

Clinical Correlation with Imaging

Imaging findings should be correlated with:

  • Constitutional symptoms (fever, weight loss)
  • Back pain and spinal tenderness
  • Neurological deficits
  • Laboratory markers (elevated ESR, positive interferon-γ release assay)

Important Considerations

  • The thoracic spine is most commonly affected, followed by lumbar and cervical regions 5
  • Multi-level non-contiguous involvement occurs more frequently than previously recognized 5
  • Significant kyphotic deformity can result from anterior column destruction 4, 5
  • Image-guided biopsy is recommended for definitive microbiological diagnosis when blood cultures are negative 1

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Relying solely on plain radiographs for early diagnosis
  • Failing to image the entire spine when TB is suspected (skip lesions may be present)
  • Misinterpreting post-treatment changes as disease progression (structural changes may persist despite clinical improvement)
  • Not correlating imaging findings with clinical and laboratory parameters

By understanding these characteristic radiographic findings, clinicians can make an earlier diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis, potentially preventing severe neurological complications and spinal deformities.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Imaging update in spinal tuberculosis.

Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2022

Research

[Tuberculosis of the posterior vertebral arch. A case report].

Journal of neuroradiology = Journal de neuroradiologie, 2002

Research

Tuberculosis of the spine: imaging features.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 1995

Research

Spinal tuberculosis: a review.

The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.