SCAI Cardiogenic Shock Classification and Treatment Implications
The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Cardiogenic Shock Classification is a validated five-stage system (A through E) that provides a standardized framework for assessing shock severity, with each progressive stage associated with significantly increased mortality risk. 1
SCAI Cardiogenic Shock Classification Stages
Stage A: At Risk
- Definition: Patient not currently experiencing cardiogenic shock but at risk for its development
- Clinical Features: May include large acute myocardial infarction, prior infarction, or acute/chronic heart failure symptoms
- Hemodynamics: Normal
- Mortality Risk: Very low (in-hospital mortality <1%) 2
Stage B: Beginning Shock
- Definition: Patient with clinical evidence of relative hypotension or tachycardia without hypoperfusion
- Clinical Features: Relative hypotension, tachycardia, preserved mental status
- Hemodynamics: SBP <90 mmHg or drop >30 mmHg from baseline, or need for low-dose inotropes/vasopressors
- Mortality Risk: Low (in-hospital mortality ~3%) 2
Stage C: Classic Cardiogenic Shock
- Definition: Patient with hypoperfusion requiring intervention beyond volume resuscitation
- Clinical Features: Hypotension with evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion
- Hemodynamics: Requires inotropes, vasopressors, or mechanical support to maintain perfusion
- Mortality Risk: Moderate (in-hospital mortality ~20-22%) 2
Stage D: Deteriorating/Doom
- Definition: Patient similar to Stage C but worsening despite initial interventions
- Clinical Features: Persistent hypoperfusion despite initial interventions for >30 minutes
- Hemodynamics: Worsening despite inotropes, vasopressors, or initial mechanical support
- Mortality Risk: High (in-hospital mortality ~54-63%) 2
Stage E: Extremis
- Definition: Patient experiencing cardiac arrest with ongoing CPR and/or ECMO support
- Clinical Features: Cardiovascular collapse, often with multiple organ failure
- Hemodynamics: Refractory circulatory collapse requiring multiple interventions
- Mortality Risk: Very high (in-hospital mortality >90%) 2
Cardiac Arrest Modifier
An important aspect of the SCAI classification is the cardiac arrest modifier. At every stage of SCAI shock, the presence of cardiac arrest significantly increases mortality 1. This should be noted as a suffix (e.g., Stage C-A) when cardiac arrest has occurred.
Clinical Implications and Treatment Approach
Monitoring and Assessment
- All patients with suspected cardiogenic shock should be classified according to SCAI stages to guide treatment intensity and urgency
- Regular reassessment is essential as patients can rapidly progress between stages
- Transthoracic echocardiography should be performed immediately for diagnosis and severity assessment 1
Stage-Based Treatment Approach
Stage A (At Risk):
- Close monitoring for signs of deterioration
- Optimize volume status and medical therapy
- Consider early cardiology consultation
Stage B (Beginning):
- Initiate hemodynamic monitoring
- Judicious fluid management based on volume status
- Consider low-dose inotropes if needed
- Prepare for potential escalation of care
Stage C (Classic):
- Immediate invasive hemodynamic monitoring
- Inotropic and/or vasopressor support
- Consider mechanical circulatory support (MCS)
- Urgent coronary revascularization if ischemic etiology 1
Stage D (Deteriorating):
- Escalate pharmacological support
- Strong consideration for mechanical circulatory support
- Transfer to specialized shock center if available
- Multidisciplinary shock team activation
Stage E (Extremis):
- Immediate full support measures
- Advanced mechanical circulatory support (VA-ECMO, Impella)
- Highest priority for interventions to address underlying cause
- Mortality remains extremely high despite interventions 3
Prognostic Value and Clinical Utility
The SCAI classification has been validated across multiple studies and patient populations:
- Provides consistent risk stratification across different etiologies of cardiogenic shock 4
- Predicts both short-term and long-term mortality 2
- Applies to both acute myocardial infarction and non-ischemic causes of shock 5
- Helps guide appropriate use of mechanical circulatory support devices 3
Implementation Considerations
- The classification should be applied at presentation and reassessed frequently throughout hospitalization
- Electronic health record integration can facilitate continuous monitoring and alert systems 4
- Treatment algorithms should be developed based on SCAI stages to standardize care
- Specialized cardiogenic shock teams should be activated based on SCAI stage progression
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failing to recognize early shock stages (A and B) where intervention may prevent progression
- Delaying mechanical support in rapidly deteriorating patients (Stage D)
- Not recognizing mixed shock states (cardiogenic plus other forms)
- Overlooking the cardiac arrest modifier, which significantly impacts prognosis
- Delaying revascularization in ischemic cardiogenic shock, which remains the cornerstone of treatment 1
The SCAI classification provides a standardized language for describing cardiogenic shock severity that can guide treatment decisions and facilitate communication among healthcare providers. Its adoption into clinical practice has the potential to improve outcomes through earlier recognition and appropriate escalation of care.