What is the role of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in diagnosing and treating palpitations?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Role of CRP in Palpitations

C-reactive protein (CRP) testing has limited utility in the evaluation of palpitations and should not be routinely ordered for this symptom alone, as there is insufficient evidence supporting its use as a primary diagnostic tool for palpitations. 1

CRP and Cardiac Arrhythmias

CRP has been studied in relation to cardiac arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation (AF), with some notable findings:

  • Patients with atrial arrhythmias show elevated CRP levels compared to control patients (median 0.21 vs 0.096 mg/dL) 2
  • Higher CRP levels are found in patients with persistent AF (0.34 mg/dL) compared to those with paroxysmal AF (0.18 mg/dL) 2
  • Elevated CRP is associated with increased risk of AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion 3

These findings suggest that inflammation may play a role in the pathogenesis and persistence of certain arrhythmias, particularly AF. However, this does not establish CRP as a primary diagnostic tool for palpitations.

Appropriate Use of CRP Testing

When evaluating palpitations, CRP testing may be considered in specific scenarios:

  • When there is suspicion of an underlying inflammatory condition contributing to palpitations
  • As part of cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with intermediate risk (10-20% risk of coronary heart disease per 10 years) 1
  • When monitoring known inflammatory cardiac conditions that may manifest with palpitations

Interpretation of CRP Results

If CRP testing is performed in a patient with palpitations, results should be interpreted with caution:

  • Low risk: <1.0 mg/L
  • Average risk: 1.0-3.0 mg/L
  • High risk: >3.0 mg/L
  • Mild inflammation: 10-40 mg/L
  • Acute inflammation/bacterial infection: 40-200 mg/L 1

Limitations of CRP Testing for Palpitations

Several important limitations should be considered:

  1. CRP has limited specificity (40-67%) as a marker of bacterial infection 1
  2. Multiple non-pathological factors can influence CRP levels including age, sex, BMI, smoking, exercise, diet, and sleep 1
  3. Standard ECG is more valuable for initial evaluation of palpitations than CRP 4
  4. There are no established guidelines recommending routine CRP testing for palpitations

Clinical Approach to Palpitations

For patients presenting with palpitations, a more evidence-based approach includes:

  1. Detailed history focusing on frequency, duration, and associated symptoms
  2. Standard 12-lead ECG (more valuable than CRP for initial evaluation) 4
  3. Consider continuous ECG monitoring for patients with recurrent symptoms
  4. Evaluate for structural heart disease with echocardiography if indicated
  5. Reserve CRP testing for cases where there is suspicion of underlying inflammatory conditions

Conclusion

While CRP may have some association with certain cardiac arrhythmias that cause palpitations (particularly AF), it should not be used as a primary diagnostic tool for evaluating palpitations. The European Heart Journal guidelines and other evidence suggest that standard ECG monitoring is more valuable for initial evaluation 4. CRP testing should be reserved for specific clinical scenarios where inflammation is suspected as a contributing factor to cardiac symptoms.

References

Guideline

Inflammatory Marker Testing Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.