What is the best management for a patient with moderate aortic insufficiency, moderate mitral regurgitation, and severe tricuspid regurgitation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Moderate Aortic Insufficiency with Moderate Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation

For patients with moderate aortic insufficiency, moderate mitral regurgitation, and severe tricuspid regurgitation, surgical intervention is indicated with tricuspid valve surgery being the priority due to the severe tricuspid regurgitation. 1

Assessment and Evaluation

  • Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment is essential to evaluate:

    • Severity of each valve lesion
    • Right ventricular size and function
    • Left ventricular size and function (LVEF, LVESD, LVEDD)
    • Tricuspid annular dilation (significant if ≥40 mm or >21 mm/m²)
    • Pulmonary artery pressure
  • Additional imaging may be necessary:

    • Cardiac MRI or CT for better assessment of RV function when echocardiography is suboptimal
    • Right heart catheterization if pulmonary hypertension treatment is being considered 2

Treatment Algorithm

1. Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation Management

  • Surgical intervention is indicated for severe tricuspid regurgitation in this case, as per Class I recommendation from ESC guidelines 1, 2
  • Tricuspid valve repair is preferred over replacement when feasible:
    • Rigid or semi-rigid ring annuloplasty is the gold standard for secondary TR 2
    • Biological prostheses are preferred over mechanical ones for valve replacement due to lower thrombosis risk 2

2. Approach to Moderate Aortic Insufficiency and Mitral Regurgitation

  • Combined valve surgery approach is recommended:

    • Address the severe tricuspid regurgitation (Class I indication) 1
    • Consider concomitant aortic valve replacement for moderate AI when undergoing other valve surgery 1
    • Consider mitral valve repair/replacement for moderate MR when undergoing other valve surgery 1
  • Decision factors for addressing moderate AI and MR:

    • Etiology of valve disease (primary vs. secondary)
    • Left ventricular function and dimensions
    • Surgical risk profile
    • Expected durability of repair

3. Specific Considerations

  • For moderate aortic insufficiency:

    • AVR is reasonable in patients with moderate AR undergoing other open-heart procedures 1
    • If primary AI, it's unlikely to improve with treatment of other valves
  • For moderate mitral regurgitation:

    • If secondary MR, it may improve after correction of other valve lesions 1
    • If primary MR, concomitant mitral valve surgery should be considered 1

Important Caveats and Pitfalls

  1. Surgical risk assessment is crucial:

    • High surgical risk with triple valve surgery
    • Mortality risk is significantly higher in patients with severe TR undergoing surgery (50% mortality within 3 months in one study) 3
    • Heart Team approach is essential for decision-making
  2. Staged approach may be considered in high-risk patients:

    • Address the severe TR first
    • Re-evaluate the moderate AI and MR after recovery
    • This approach may be particularly relevant if MR is secondary and might improve after TR correction
  3. Medical therapy while awaiting surgery:

    • Diuretics are recommended as first-line therapy for symptomatic TR with congestion 2
    • Loop diuretics to reduce systemic and hepatic congestion
    • Aldosterone antagonists for additional benefit, especially with hepatic congestion
  4. Delaying surgery risks:

    • Irreversible RV damage
    • Organ failure
    • Poor surgical outcomes 2
  5. Post-intervention monitoring:

    • Regular echocardiographic surveillance is essential
    • Monitor for progression of moderate AI and MR
    • Assess for improvement or worsening of RV function

Evidence Quality and Limitations

  • Limited high-quality evidence exists for the management of multiple valve disease
  • Most guidelines focus on single valve disease
  • Treatment recommendations for mixed valve disease are largely based on expert consensus
  • The European Society of Cardiology provides the most comprehensive guidance on tricuspid valve disease management 1, 2

Remember that severe TR is associated with worse outcomes, and timely intervention is crucial to prevent irreversible right ventricular damage and organ failure 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Tricuspid Regurgitation Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.