What are the recommendations for glutathione and NAD (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide) IV therapy based on Organic Acids Test (OATs) results?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Glutathione and NAD IV Therapy Based on OATs Results

There is insufficient scientific evidence to recommend glutathione and NAD+ IV therapy based on Organic Acids Test (OATs) results, as no clinical guidelines support this practice for improving morbidity, mortality, or quality of life outcomes.

Current Evidence on NAD+ and Glutathione

NAD+ (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide)

  • NAD+ plays critical roles in:
    • Mitochondrial energy metabolism
    • DNA repair mechanisms
    • Maintenance of cellular redox status
    • Serving as a cofactor for over 400 enzymes 1
    • Supporting calcium homeostasis and gene expression 1

Glutathione

  • Functions as a major cellular antioxidant
  • Works in conjunction with NAD(P)H in redox reactions
  • Glutathione reductase uses NADPH to convert oxidized glutathione (GSSG) to reduced glutathione (GSH) 2
  • Maintains cellular redox balance critical for proper metabolic function 3

Analysis of Available Guidelines

Despite the biochemical importance of these compounds, current medical guidelines do not support IV administration of glutathione or NAD+ based on OATs results:

  1. No mention in nutritional guidelines: The ESPEN micronutrient guidelines discuss various vitamins and minerals but do not recommend IV glutathione or NAD+ therapy 4

  2. Niacin (NAD+ precursor) recommendations exist only for oral supplementation:

    • Standard treatment for niacin deficiency: 15-20 mg/day nicotinic acid or 300 mg/day nicotinamide orally 1
    • Enteral nutrition should provide 18-40 mg/day of niacin in 1500 kcal 1
    • No recommendations for direct NAD+ IV administration
  3. Potential risks:

    • High-dose niacin (3g/day) may cause hepatotoxicity 1
    • Upper limits established for oral intake but not for IV administration
    • Nicotinic acid can cause flushing reactions and potentially risky metabolic changes 5

Research Evidence on NAD+ and Glutathione

Recent research shows:

  • NADH/NAD+ and GSH/GSSG ratios are important for metabolic health, particularly in insulin resistance 3
  • NAD(P)H may function as a direct antioxidant in addition to its role in enzymatic reactions 2
  • Different NAD+ precursors (nicotinamide, niacin, nicotinamide riboside, and nicotinamide mononucleotide) have varying effects on NAD+ levels when administered orally 5

However, these studies:

  • Do not specifically address IV administration
  • Do not validate using OATs results to guide therapy
  • Do not demonstrate improved morbidity, mortality, or quality of life outcomes

Clinical Implications

When considering glutathione and NAD+ IV therapy:

  • Lack of standardization: No established protocols for dosing based on OATs results
  • Insufficient evidence: No clinical trials demonstrating efficacy for improving patient-centered outcomes
  • Alternative approaches: Consider addressing nutritional deficiencies through dietary sources or oral supplementation first:
    • Niacin (NAD+ precursor): Meat, poultry, fish, nuts, legumes, whole grains 1
    • Glutathione precursors: Sulfur-containing foods (garlic, onions, cruciferous vegetables)

Conclusion for Clinical Practice

Given the lack of clinical guideline support and absence of high-quality evidence demonstrating improved outcomes, clinicians should:

  1. Address any confirmed nutritional deficiencies through conventional means
  2. Consider oral supplementation of precursors when indicated
  3. Recognize that IV glutathione and NAD+ therapy based on OATs results represents an experimental approach not currently supported by clinical guidelines

If a patient is interested in these therapies, they should be informed about the experimental nature and lack of evidence supporting their use for improving meaningful health outcomes.

References

Guideline

Nutrition and Lifestyle Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

NAD(P)H, a directly operating antioxidant?

FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2001

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.