What is the definition of a radial scar in breast pathology?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Definition of Radial Scar in Breast Pathology

A radial scar is a benign breast lesion characterized by a fibroelastotic core with entrapped ducts and surrounding radiating ducts and lobules, which can mimic carcinoma both radiologically and histologically.

Key Pathological Features

  • Central fibroelastotic core
  • Entrapped ducts within the core
  • Radiating ducts and lobules surrounding the core
  • Stellate appearance that can mimic carcinoma
  • Size-based classification: radial scars (<1 cm) vs. complex sclerosing lesions (>1 cm) 1

Radiological Characteristics

  • "Black star" appearance on mammography
  • Long, thin spicules radiating from a radiolucent central area 2
  • Variable appearance on ultrasound
  • Increasingly detected on screening mammography with an incidence of 0.03% to 0.09% of all core needle biopsies 3

Clinical Significance

Radial scars are important to identify and properly manage because:

  1. They mimic carcinoma radiologically and histologically
  2. They are associated with atypia and malignancy in approximately 29% of cases 3
  3. They may represent an independent risk factor for future breast cancer development 4

Management Recommendations

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines address radial scars in their breast cancer screening and diagnosis recommendations:

  • Radial scars found on core needle biopsy should undergo surgical excision in most cases 5
  • Select patients may be suitable for monitoring in lieu of surgical excision 5
  • Surgical excision is particularly recommended when:
    • The lesion is >1.0 cm
    • There are worrisome radiographic findings
    • There is radiologic-pathologic discordance 3

Upgrade Risk

  • Studies show variable upgrade rates to malignancy:
    • Higher risk: Approximately 29% of radial scars may be upstaged to in situ or invasive carcinomas or other high-risk lesions 3
    • Lower risk: Some recent studies report very low upgrade rates, suggesting close clinical follow-up might be appropriate for select cases 6

Common Pitfalls

  • Misdiagnosis due to similar appearance to carcinoma
  • Sampling error during core needle biopsy
  • Underestimation of associated atypia or malignancy
  • Failure to recognize that a mammographic finding suggestive of radial scar may actually represent a malignancy 2

Surveillance After Diagnosis

  • If surgical excision confirms benign radial scar without atypia:
    • Return to routine breast screening 5
  • If associated with atypical hyperplasia or LCIS:
    • Consider risk-reduction therapy
    • Maintain regular breast screening 5

In conclusion, while radial scars are benign lesions, their association with atypia and malignancy warrants careful evaluation and management, typically involving surgical excision in most cases to rule out associated malignancy.

References

Research

Radial Scar: a management dilemma.

La Radiologia medica, 2021

Research

Radial scar of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation in 22 cases.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 1999

Research

Pathology and clinical relevance of radial scars: a review.

Journal of clinical pathology, 2003

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Radial scar on image-guided breast biopsy: is surgical excision necessary?

Breast cancer research and treatment, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.