Treatment of Osteoporosis in a Woman with T-score -1.4 and Chronic T11 Compression Fracture
A woman with a T-score of -1.4 in the lumbar spine and a chronic compression fracture at T11 should be treated with prescription osteoporosis medications, as the presence of a vertebral fracture indicates osteoporosis regardless of the T-score. 1
Diagnostic Considerations
The diagnostic approach in this case requires careful consideration of both the BMD measurement and the presence of a fracture:
- The T-score of -1.4 falls within the "osteopenia" or "low bone mass" range (T-score between -1.0 and -2.5) 1
- However, several medical societies (including EANM, ASBMR, and CSEM) pragmatically propose that osteoporosis may be presumed in the presence of a prior low-trauma major osteoporotic fracture, even with a normal BMD 1
- A vertebral compression fracture is considered a major osteoporotic fracture and is diagnostic of osteoporosis regardless of BMD values 1
Treatment Algorithm
Confirm fracture etiology:
- Determine if the T11 compression fracture was low-trauma/fragility-related
- Historical information about the circumstances of fracture is valuable to clarify this 1
Risk stratification:
- The patient should be considered at high risk for future fractures due to:
- Existing vertebral compression fracture
- T-score in the osteopenic range (-1.4)
- A U.S. NHANES study showed that among participants ≥65 years with vertebral fractures, the mean femoral neck T-score was -1.4, and only 38% had osteoporosis by BMD criteria alone 1
- The patient should be considered at high risk for future fractures due to:
First-line treatment:
Alternative treatments (if oral bisphosphonates are not appropriate):
Adjunctive measures:
Monitoring
- Repeat BMD measurements should be conducted at the same facility with the same DXA system when possible 1
- Follow-up DXA scans are typically recommended every 1-2 years for high-risk individuals 5
- Quantitative BMD comparison with serial measurements should be based on absolute BMD values in g/cm², not T-scores or Z-scores 1
Clinical Considerations and Pitfalls
- Important caveat: It's essential to determine if the vertebral fracture was truly low-trauma. If the fracture was associated with significant trauma, treatment decisions may differ 1
- Monitoring challenges: When comparing serial DXA scans, be aware that changes must exceed the least significant change (LSC) to be considered clinically meaningful 1
- Diagnostic confusion: A T-score alone may underestimate fracture risk in patients with vertebral fractures, as demonstrated by the NHANES study showing many patients with vertebral fractures had T-scores better than -2.5 1
The presence of a vertebral compression fracture significantly increases the risk of future fractures, regardless of BMD values, and therefore warrants pharmacologic intervention to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with subsequent fractures.