Clinical Uses of C-Peptide Laboratory Testing
C-peptide testing is primarily used to differentiate between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, assess residual beta-cell function, and guide appropriate diabetes management strategies. 1
What is C-peptide?
C-peptide (Connecting peptide) is a polypeptide that:
- Is produced in equimolar amounts to insulin during the cleavage of proinsulin in pancreatic beta cells
- Reflects endogenous insulin secretion more accurately than insulin itself because it is not extracted by the liver and has a longer half-life 2
- Serves as a reliable marker of beta-cell function 1
Primary Clinical Applications
1. Differentiating Diabetes Types
C-peptide measurement is particularly valuable in:
- Patients already on insulin therapy 1
- Cases where clinical presentation is ambiguous
- Situations where accurate classification impacts treatment decisions
C-peptide levels should be interpreted as follows:
- <0.6 ng/mL (<200 pmol/L): Type 1 diabetes pattern - requires insulin therapy
- 0.6-1.8 ng/mL (200-600 pmol/L): Indeterminate - may need additional testing
- >1.8 ng/mL (>600 pmol/L): Type 2 diabetes pattern - consider non-insulin therapies 1
2. Assessing Residual Beta-Cell Function
C-peptide testing helps:
- Determine the degree of insulin deficiency in diabetes
- Monitor disease progression over time
- Identify patients who may benefit from specific therapeutic approaches 3
- Evaluate the need for insulin therapy in patients initially diagnosed with type 2 diabetes 4
3. Identifying Special Forms of Diabetes
C-peptide is useful in diagnosing:
- LADA (Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults): Clinically resembles type 2 diabetes but shows positive pancreatic autoantibodies and lower C-peptide levels 4
- MODY (Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young): Persistence of C-peptide is an important clinical feature 4
- Factitious hypoglycemia: Differentiating between endogenous and exogenous hyperinsulinism 5
Optimal Testing Methods
The most informative C-peptide measurements include:
- Random C-peptide with concurrent glucose measurement: Collected within 5 hours of eating 1
- Stimulated C-peptide testing: Glucagon stimulation test provides good balance of sensitivity and practicality 6
- Timing considerations: Most informative after 3-5 years from diagnosis when persistence of substantial insulin secretion suggests type 2 or monogenic diabetes 1, 3
Clinical Implications of C-peptide Results
For Treatment Selection:
- Very low C-peptide (<0.6 ng/mL) indicates need for basal-bolus insulin therapy 1
- Borderline low C-peptide (0.6-1.8 ng/mL) may warrant basal insulin plus oral agents 1
- Higher C-peptide levels suggest potential benefit from non-insulin therapies 1
For Prognosis:
- Low C-peptide levels are associated with:
- Increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications
- Poorer glycemic control
- Higher risk of severe hypoglycemia 1
Common Pitfalls and Considerations
- C-peptide results should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical presentation and other laboratory findings (especially autoantibodies)
- Renal impairment can elevate C-peptide levels due to reduced clearance
- C-peptide testing is most valuable when performed at appropriate times in the disease course:
- Autoantibody testing is most valuable at or near diagnosis
- C-peptide testing is most informative after several years of disease 1
- Fasting C-peptide may underestimate residual beta-cell function; postprandial or stimulated measurements may be more informative 2
By providing objective evidence of endogenous insulin secretion, C-peptide testing offers valuable insights that can guide diabetes classification, treatment selection, and long-term management strategies.