Management of Acute Urinary Retention with Hematuria in an Elderly Male with BPH
The patient requires urgent urological referral for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) due to the combination of hematuria with clots, worsening retention despite catheter change, and fatigue suggesting possible anemia. 1
Clinical Assessment of the Current Situation
This 94-year-old male presents with several concerning features:
- Chronic urinary retention requiring catheter use due to BPH
- Acute worsening of retention despite catheter change
- Blood clots in the urine (hematuria)
- Fatigue (possibly indicating anemia from blood loss)
These symptoms represent a progression from chronic BPH to a situation with imperative indications for surgical intervention.
Rationale for Surgical Management
The presence of persistent hematuria with clots in this setting represents an absolute indication for surgical intervention according to guidelines 1. When medical therapy has failed and complications such as hematuria develop, the standard of care shifts from conservative management to procedural intervention.
The patient's symptoms indicate:
- Possible clot retention causing catheter blockage
- Ongoing blood loss (suggested by fatigue)
- Failure of conservative management (catheter change)
Specific Management Steps
Immediate measures:
- Ensure catheter patency with larger bore catheter (22-24 Fr) if not already in place
- Consider gentle bladder irrigation to clear clots if possible
- Obtain complete blood count to assess for anemia
- Check renal function and electrolytes
Definitive management:
- Urgent urological referral for TURP as the gold standard intervention 1
- TURP will address both the obstruction and the source of bleeding
Why TURP is Preferred Over Other Options
TURP remains the gold standard for interventional treatment of BPH with complications 1. In this case:
- Medical therapy is inappropriate given the acute complication (hematuria with clots)
- Less invasive procedures would not adequately address the bleeding
- The patient has already failed conservative management with catheter changes
Important Considerations
- Age is not a contraindication: While the patient's advanced age (94) increases surgical risk, the presence of hematuria with potential anemia represents a greater risk if left untreated
- Preoperative optimization: Blood transfusion may be necessary if significant anemia is present
- Anesthetic considerations: Regional anesthesia may be preferable given the patient's age
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Delay in surgical referral: Continuing conservative management with repeated catheter changes is inappropriate when hematuria with clots is present
- Attributing symptoms solely to catheter issues: The combination of worsening retention, hematuria, and fatigue indicates disease progression requiring definitive intervention
- Underestimating the significance of hematuria: In the setting of BPH, hematuria with clots that persists despite catheter change is an indication for surgery 2
The presence of hematuria with clots in a patient with BPH represents a clear indication for surgical management, and TURP remains the most effective approach to address both the obstruction and the source of bleeding.