Common Causes of Elevated Liver Function Tests (LFTs)
Elevated liver function tests (LFTs) are most commonly caused by non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), alcohol-related liver disease, and chronic viral hepatitis, with the pattern of elevation often providing important diagnostic clues to the underlying etiology. 1
Hepatocellular Pattern (Predominant ALT/AST Elevation)
Common Causes
- Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) - Most common cause in developed countries, affecting 20-30% of general population, up to 70% in obesity and 90% in diabetes 1
- Alcohol-related liver disease - Typically shows AST:ALT ratio >2 (often >3) 2
- Viral hepatitis - Acute or chronic (hepatitis A, B, C, D, E, EBV, CMV, HSV) 2
- Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) - Prescription medications, OTC drugs, herbal supplements 2
Less Common Causes
- Autoimmune hepatitis
- Hemochromatosis - Genetic disorder with iron overload 2
- Wilson's disease - Genetic disorder with copper accumulation 2
- Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
- Ischemic hepatitis (shock liver)
- Muscle disorders - Can cause AST elevation (check creatine kinase) 2
Cholestatic Pattern (Predominant ALP Elevation)
Common Causes
- Biliary obstruction - Gallstones, strictures, tumors
- Primary biliary cholangitis
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis
- Drug-induced cholestasis
Less Common Causes
- Infiltrative diseases - Sarcoidosis, amyloidosis
- Malignancy - 57% of isolated ALP elevations of unclear etiology are associated with underlying malignancy 2
- Sepsis
- Bone disorders - Can cause non-hepatic ALP elevation 2
Mixed Pattern (Both Hepatocellular and Cholestatic)
- Drug-induced liver injury
- Alcoholic hepatitis
- Infiltrative liver diseases
- Advanced liver disease/cirrhosis
Clinical Approach to Elevated LFTs
Step 1: Assess Pattern and Severity
- Hepatocellular pattern: ALT/AST elevated more than ALP
- Mild: <5× upper limit of normal
- Moderate: 5-10× upper limit of normal
- Severe: >10× upper limit of normal 1
- Cholestatic pattern: ALP elevated more than ALT/AST
- Mixed pattern: Both elevated proportionally
Step 2: First-Line Investigations
- Repeat LFTs to confirm abnormality
- Complete blood count with platelets
- Hepatitis serology (HBsAg, HCV antibody)
- Liver function panel (bilirubin, albumin, INR)
- GGT to confirm hepatic source of ALP elevation
- Creatine kinase if muscle origin suspected 2
Step 3: Risk Assessment and Additional Testing
- Lifestyle factors: Alcohol intake, obesity, diabetes
- Medication review: Prescription drugs, OTC medications, supplements
- Abdominal ultrasound: First-line imaging for fatty liver, biliary obstruction, masses 2
- Second-line testing based on clinical suspicion:
- Autoimmune markers (ANA, ASMA, AMA)
- Iron studies (ferritin, transferrin saturation)
- Ceruloplasmin (Wilson's disease)
- Alpha-1 antitrypsin levels
- Additional viral serology (HEV, EBV, CMV) 2
Important Clinical Considerations
AST:ALT Ratio
- >2: Suggests alcohol-related liver disease
- <1: Consider NAFLD, viral hepatitis, or Wilson's disease 2
Pitfalls to Avoid
- Attributing elevation solely to NAFLD without excluding other causes 2
- Ignoring mild elevations - May indicate significant underlying disease, particularly in cholestatic processes 2
- Not evaluating alcohol use - Even when another cause is identified 1
- Assuming normal LFTs exclude liver disease - LFTs can be normal despite significant fibrosis or cirrhosis 3
Monitoring Recommendations
- Lifestyle modifications: Repeat LFTs in 4-8 weeks 2
- Medication-related: Check LFTs at 4 weeks, then every 3-6 months 2
- Persistent unexplained elevation: Consider referral for further evaluation, including possible liver biopsy 1
Special Considerations
Drug-Induced Liver Injury
- Common medications: Statins, antibiotics, NSAIDs, antiepileptics
- Pioglitazone: Rare cases of hepatotoxicity reported; monitor LFTs before initiation and periodically thereafter 4
Fibrosis Assessment
- Non-invasive tests: FIB-4 score, NAFLD fibrosis score, elastography
- Consider referral if evidence of advanced fibrosis on non-invasive testing 1, 2
Remember that LFTs alone have poor predictive value for significant liver disease, with only 3.9% of patients with abnormal values being diagnosed with significant liver disease within 5 years 1. A systematic approach based on pattern recognition and targeted investigations is essential for accurate diagnosis and management.