What is the technical difference between MonaLisa (intrauterine device) Copper IUDs that explains their varying durations of effectiveness, specifically between the 3-year and 10-year versions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Technical Differences Between MonaLisa Copper IUD 3-Year and 10-Year Versions

The primary technical difference between the 3-year and 10-year MonaLisa Copper IUDs is the diameter of the copper wire used, with the 10-year version utilizing thicker copper wire (0.4mm) compared to the thinner wire (0.3mm) in the 3-year version, which directly impacts the durability and longevity of the device.

Copper Wire Specifications and Durability

The technical differences that explain the varying durations of effectiveness include:

  • Wire Diameter: The 10-year MonaLisa IUD (similar to the Multiload 375) uses 0.4mm diameter copper wire, while the 3-year version (similar to the Multiload 250) uses 0.3mm diameter wire 1

  • Copper Wire Breakage: Research shows that thinner copper wires (0.3mm) have significantly higher breakage rates compared to thicker wires (0.4mm), with cumulative breakage rates of 5.4 per 100 IUDs after 3 years for the thinner wire versus 3.8 per 100 IUDs after 5 years for the thicker wire 1

  • Surface Area of Copper: The 10-year versions typically have a larger surface area of copper (often 380mm² like the Copper T380A), while shorter-duration models have less copper surface area (approximately 250-300mm²)

Mechanism of Action and Effectiveness

Both versions work through the same mechanism:

  • Copper ions released from the device create a hostile environment for sperm and may interfere with implantation
  • The effectiveness is highest when the IUD is properly positioned at the fundus of the uterus 2
  • Both versions are highly effective with failure rates less than 1 per 100 women in the first year of use 3

Clinical Considerations

When considering the different versions:

  • Continuation Rates: The Copper T-380A (similar to the 10-year MonaLisa) has approximately 50% of users continuing after 5 years, indicating high acceptability despite potential side effects 3

  • Size Considerations: Smaller copper IUDs (like the 3-year versions) may be more suitable for nulliparous women with smaller uterine cavities, with research showing higher continuation rates and lower rates of removal for bleeding/pain compared to larger devices 4

  • Expulsion Rates: Proper fundal placement is crucial for both versions, as malpositioned IUDs have reduced contraceptive efficacy and increased risk of expulsion 2

Common Side Effects and Management

Both versions share similar side effects:

  • Unscheduled spotting or light bleeding, especially in the first 3-6 months of use 2
  • Menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea are the most common reasons for discontinuation 3
  • The risk of pelvic inflammatory disease is highest in the first 20 days after insertion 2

Important Considerations for Clinical Practice

  • Cost-Effectiveness: The 10-year version provides longer protection and may be more cost-effective for women seeking long-term contraception

  • Extended Use: Research indicates that copper IUDs can often be used beyond their labeled duration, with studies showing continued effectiveness up to 15-20 years for some copper T devices 5

  • Replacement Timing: When removing an IUD, consider immediate replacement if continued contraception is desired, as many women who plan for delayed reinsertion never return for placement 2

Remember that copper IUDs do not protect against STIs/HIV, and consistent condom use is recommended for those at risk 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.