When should a nephrostomy (percutaneous nephrostomy) tube be considered?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Indications for Nephrostomy Tube Placement

Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) should be considered in cases of urinary tract obstruction with evidence of declining renal function, pyonephrosis, or sepsis, as it provides rapid and effective decompression of the collecting system with technical success rates approaching 100% in dilated systems. 1

Primary Indications for Nephrostomy Tube Placement

Urgent/Emergent Indications

  • Obstructive pyelonephritis/pyonephrosis with sepsis

    • Patients presenting with fever, leukocytosis, flank pain, and signs of sepsis require immediate decompression 1
    • PCN is lifesaving in these cases and should not be delayed
    • Serum C-reactive protein may help guide urgency of placement 1
  • Acute renal failure due to obstruction

    • Significant elevation in serum creatinine with hydronephrosis
    • Recent data shows statistically significant improvement in renal function after PCN placement 2

Non-Emergent Indications

  • Malignant ureteral obstruction

    • Most beneficial when:
      • Obstruction is due to untreated primary malignancy 3
      • Obstruction is from relapsed disease with viable treatment options 3
      • Obstruction is caused by non-malignant complications of previous surgery/radiation 3
    • Not recommended when:
      • Patient has relapsed disease with no conventional treatment options (median survival only 38 days) 3
  • Post-urinary diversion obstruction

    • When loopogram shows no reflux into distal ureters suggesting inherent stricture 1
    • When retrograde access is difficult due to altered anatomy 1
  • Stone disease

    • To provide temporary drainage before definitive treatment
    • As access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large stones (>20mm) 4
    • When infection with obstruction is present (mandatory before attempting stone removal) 4

Technical Considerations

Success Rates and Approach

  • Technical success rates:
    • 95-100% for dilated collecting systems 1
    • 80-90% for non-dilated systems 1
    • Most operators use ultrasound for initial access followed by fluoroscopy 1

Complications

  • Overall complication rate: 6.3-10% 1
  • Common complications:
    • Catheter displacement
    • Bleeding (mild hematuria in ~50% of patients)
    • Sepsis
    • Risk factors for post-procedural sepsis include diabetes and renal calculi 1

Special Considerations

Malignant Obstruction

  • Strict selection criteria should be applied:
    • Evaluate if there are viable treatment options for the underlying malignancy
    • Consider patient's overall prognosis and quality of life
    • PCN may improve quality of life and allow patients to return home 5
    • Unilateral PCN may be sufficient in many cases 5

Alternative Options

  • Retrograde ureteral stenting should be considered first when feasible
  • Subcutaneous ureteral bypass may be an alternative to permanent nephrostomy in select patients with malignant ureteral obstruction 6
  • Percutaneous nephroureteral catheters (PCNU) for internal drainage through the ureter and bladder 1

Follow-up Management

  • Regular monitoring of renal function
  • Catheter exchanges typically every 2-3 months
  • Assessment for long-term complications and functionality 2

Contraindications

  • Uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Lack of safe percutaneous access
  • Terminal illness with very short life expectancy and no viable treatment options 3

PCN is a well-established and effective procedure for urinary tract decompression with high technical success rates. Patient selection is crucial, particularly in malignant obstruction, where the presence of viable treatment options significantly impacts outcomes.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Percutaneous Nephrostomy as a Procedure in the Treatment of Urinary Tract Obstruction - Experiences in the University Clinic of Urology in Skopje.

Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki), 2024

Guideline

Management of Pelvic Ureteric Junction Stones

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Use of percutaneous nephrostomy in malignant ureteric obstruction.

The British journal of radiology, 1991

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.