Would a urinalysis supervisor be concerned about the validity of results in cases of RBC (Red Blood Cell) casts with a negative blood test, triple phosphate and ammonium biurate crystals in alkaline urine, Candida albicans with leukocytes and a negative nitrite test, or many budding yeasts in a specimen from a bedridden, diabetic patient?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Urinalysis Discrepancies: Validity Concerns Assessment

A urinalysis supervisor would be concerned about the validity of results in the case of RBC casts with a negative reagent strip test for blood, but would not be concerned about the other scenarios presented.

Analysis of Each Scenario

1. RBC casts with negative reagent strip test for blood

  • CONCERNED
  • This represents a significant discrepancy that requires investigation.
  • RBC casts are formed when red blood cells pass through damaged glomeruli and become trapped in renal tubules, indicating glomerular bleeding 1.
  • The presence of RBC casts strongly suggests glomerular disease, which should be accompanied by a positive blood test on reagent strip 1.
  • The sensitivity of hemoglobin detection on reagent strips is approximately 70.8% 2, meaning false negatives can occur, but the presence of RBC casts with a completely negative blood test is highly unusual and suggests either specimen contamination or laboratory error.

2. Triple phosphate and ammonium biurate crystals in a specimen with pH of 8.0

  • NOT CONCERNED
  • This is a consistent finding with no discrepancy.
  • Triple phosphate (struvite) and ammonium biurate crystals typically form in alkaline urine.
  • A pH of 8.0 represents alkaline urine, which provides the perfect environment for these crystals to form.
  • This is a normal chemical relationship and does not indicate any validity issues with the testing.

3. Candida albicans and leukocytes in a specimen with a negative nitrite test

  • NOT CONCERNED
  • This is a consistent finding with no discrepancy.
  • The nitrite test specifically detects gram-negative bacteria that convert nitrate to nitrite 3.
  • Candida albicans is a fungus, not a bacterium, and does not produce nitrite.
  • Leukocytes can be present due to the inflammatory response to the fungal infection 3.
  • The sensitivity of nitrite testing is only about 53% (15-82%) even for bacterial infections 3, and it would not detect fungal infections at all.

4. Many budding yeasts in a specimen from a bedridden, diabetic patient

  • NOT CONCERNED
  • This is a clinically consistent finding with no discrepancy.
  • Diabetic patients, especially those who are bedridden, are at increased risk for fungal urinary tract infections due to:
    • Elevated urinary glucose levels providing nutrients for yeast growth
    • Compromised immune function associated with diabetes
    • Reduced mobility leading to poor hygiene and urinary stasis
  • The presence of budding yeasts in this clinical context is an expected finding and does not suggest any validity issues with the testing.

Important Considerations in Urinalysis Interpretation

  • Proper specimen collection and handling are crucial for accurate results. Specimens should be processed within 1 hour at room temperature or within 4 hours if refrigerated 3.
  • Laboratory findings should always be interpreted in the context of clinical information 3.
  • False-negative results can occur with reagent strip testing, with sensitivities varying by parameter:
    • Leukocyte esterase: 83% sensitivity
    • Nitrite: 53% sensitivity
    • Blood: approximately 71% sensitivity 3, 2

Common Pitfalls in Urinalysis Interpretation

  • Relying solely on reagent strip results without microscopic confirmation can lead to missed diagnoses, as demonstrated by studies showing unacceptably low sensitivities for single parameters 4.
  • Assuming all discrepancies indicate invalid results - some apparent discrepancies are actually expected findings based on the underlying pathophysiology.
  • Failing to consider the clinical context when interpreting urinalysis results, particularly in special populations such as diabetic or elderly patients 3.

In summary, only the first scenario (RBC casts with negative blood test) represents a true discrepancy that would concern a urinalysis supervisor about the validity of the results.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Urinary Tract Infection Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Reagent strip diagnosis of UTI in a high-risk population.

The American journal of emergency medicine, 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.