What is the optimal diagnostic test for a middle-aged male patient with abdominal (abd.) pain, distension, and a liver percussion note that is not dull (resonant)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Optimal Diagnostic Test for a Middle-Aged Male with Abdominal Pain, Distension, and Resonant Liver Percussion

The optimal diagnostic test for a middle-aged male with abdominal pain, distension, and resonant liver percussion is an erect abdominal X-ray (option C), as this would best detect free air under the diaphragm indicating a perforated viscus. 1, 2

Clinical Significance of Resonant Liver Percussion

When examining a patient with abdominal pain and distension, the liver percussion note is typically dull. A resonant percussion note over the liver area is highly suspicious for:

  • Free intraperitoneal air (pneumoperitoneum)
  • Displacement of the liver by air-filled bowel

This finding, particularly when accompanied by abdominal pain and distension, strongly suggests a perforated hollow viscus, most commonly a perforated peptic ulcer or perforated intestine.

Diagnostic Test Selection Algorithm

  1. Resonant liver percussion + abdominal pain/distension:

    • First-line test: Erect abdominal X-ray (option C)
    • This view allows visualization of free air under the diaphragm
  2. Why erect position is superior to supine:

    • Free air rises to the highest point in the abdomen when the patient is upright
    • Air collects under the diaphragm, creating a clear air-fluid level visible on erect films
    • Supine films may miss small amounts of free air
  3. Limitations of other options:

    • Chest X-ray erect (option A): While useful for detecting free air under the diaphragm, it doesn't provide adequate visualization of bowel gas patterns
    • Chest X-ray supine (option B): Cannot reliably detect free air as it doesn't allow air to collect under the diaphragm
    • Abdominal X-ray supine (option D): May show abnormal gas patterns but is less sensitive for free air detection

Evidence-Based Considerations

While some recent guidelines suggest that conventional radiography has limited diagnostic value in most cases of abdominal pain 3, specific clinical scenarios like suspected bowel perforation (indicated by resonant liver percussion) remain appropriate indications for plain radiography.

The American Academy of Family Physicians notes that conventional radiography may be appropriate for select patients with suspected perforated viscus 4. When perforation is suspected based on physical findings like resonant liver percussion, an erect abdominal X-ray provides the most direct visualization of free air.

Important Clinical Caveat

Although some studies have questioned the routine use of erect abdominal radiographs 1, 2, the specific clinical scenario presented (resonant liver percussion) represents a high-risk situation where visualization of free air is critical for diagnosis. In this particular case, the erect abdominal X-ray remains the most appropriate initial test.

For a more comprehensive evaluation after the initial X-ray, CT with IV contrast would be recommended as it has superior sensitivity for detecting smaller amounts of free air and can better identify the cause of perforation 5.

References

Research

The erect abdominal radiograph in the acute abdomen: should its routine use be abandoned?

British medical journal (Clinical research ed.), 1985

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Abdominal Pain Evaluation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.