What increases the risk of fetal/neonatal injury during assisted vaginal birth: when the fetus is in a flexed attitude, there is sequential use of vacuum and then forceps, the operator has completed the Advanced Labour and Risk Management (ALARM) course, or the patient has been in the second stage of labor for more than 90 minutes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Risk of Fetal/Neonatal Injury in Assisted Vaginal Birth

The risk of fetal/neonatal injury during assisted vaginal birth is significantly increased when there is sequential use of vacuum and then forceps.

Evidence Supporting This Answer

Sequential use of vacuum and forceps is associated with substantially higher risks of neonatal trauma compared to either instrument used alone. According to high-quality research evidence, this sequential approach:

  • Increases the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (relative risk 3.9) 1
  • Increases the risk of facial nerve injury (relative risk 13.3) 1
  • Increases the risk of seizures (relative risk 13.7) 1
  • Increases the risk of brachial plexus injuries (relative risk 3.2) 1

Importantly, the combined risk of sequential instrument use is greater than the sum of individual risks from each instrument for several serious complications, including intracranial hemorrhage and facial nerve injury 1.

Why Sequential Use Is Particularly Dangerous

The sequential use of instruments indicates:

  1. Failed initial attempt: The need for a second instrument suggests difficulty with the first attempt, which may indicate a challenging delivery that already carries higher risk
  2. Cumulative trauma: Each instrument application adds mechanical stress to fetal tissues
  3. Prolonged instrumentation: Extended duration of instrumental manipulation increases risk

A cohort study found that sequential instrument use was associated with greater maternal and neonatal morbidity than single instrument use, with significantly higher rates of umbilical artery pH <7.10 (adjusted OR 3.3) 2.

Other Risk Factors in Assisted Vaginal Birth

While sequential instrument use poses the highest risk among the options presented, other factors that increase risk include:

  • Prolonged second stage: While prolonged second stage (>90 minutes) increases risk, it's not as significant as sequential instrument use
  • Instrument choice: Metal vacuum cups have higher rates of neonatal trauma than forceps, while forceps have higher rates of maternal trauma 3

Incorrect Options

  • Fetus in flexed attitude: A flexed fetal attitude is actually the normal position for delivery and is associated with fewer complications than deflexed positions
  • Operator completed ALARM course: Training programs like ALARM are designed to improve outcomes, not increase risks 4

Recommendations for Practice

To minimize fetal/neonatal injury during assisted vaginal birth:

  • Avoid sequential instrument use whenever possible
  • If the first instrument fails, consider proceeding to cesarean delivery rather than attempting a second instrument
  • Ensure proper training in instrument selection and application
  • Consider the specific clinical circumstances when choosing between forceps and vacuum

Conclusion

Among the options presented, sequential use of vacuum and then forceps poses the greatest risk of fetal/neonatal injury during assisted vaginal birth, with compelling evidence showing significantly increased rates of serious complications compared to other approaches 1, 2.

References

Research

Instruments for assisted vaginal birth.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2021

Guideline

Shoulder Dystocia Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.