Assessing Fluid Responsiveness Using the Passive Leg Raise Test
The passive leg raise (PLR) test is a highly effective method for assessing fluid responsiveness in hypotensive patients, with an increase in cardiac output after PLR strongly predicting fluid responsiveness with a positive likelihood ratio of 11 and a specificity of 92%. 1
Proper Technique for PLR Test
Starting Position and Execution
- Start with patient in 45° semi-recumbent position (preferred method)
- Lower the head of the bed to flat position while simultaneously raising the legs to 45°
- Maintain this position for 30-60 seconds while monitoring hemodynamic response
- The semi-recumbent-to-supine PLR method is superior to starting from a supine position, as it produces a larger increase in cardiac preload 2
Physiological Mechanism
- PLR rapidly mobilizes approximately 300 mL of blood from the lower extremities to the thorax
- This creates a transient increase in preload without changing the patient's total intravascular volume
- Acts as a reversible "self-volume challenge" that can be performed without administering fluids 3
Measuring Response to PLR
Primary Measurement: Cardiac Output
- A positive response is defined as ≥10% increase in stroke volume or cardiac output during PLR 1, 4
- Measurement methods (in order of preference):
- Real-time cardiac output monitoring (most accurate)
- Echocardiographic measurement of stroke volume/cardiac output
- Arterial pulse pressure (less reliable)
Specific Monitoring Techniques
- Echocardiography:
- Measure left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity-time integral (VTI)
- An increase in VTI ≥12% indicates fluid responsiveness 3
- Carotid Flow:
- Measure carotid flow VTI using echo-Doppler
- An increase ≥11% predicts fluid responsiveness with 77.3% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity 5
- Plethysmographic Variability Index (PVI):
- A decrease in PVI ≤-24.1% during PLR predicts fluid responsiveness with 95% sensitivity and 80% specificity 6
Clinical Application and Interpretation
When to Use PLR Test
- Patients with hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg, MAP <70 mmHg)
- Patients with signs of tissue hypoperfusion (oliguria, tachycardia)
- Particularly valuable in patients with:
- Spontaneous breathing efforts
- Cardiac arrhythmias
- Low tidal volume ventilation
- Situations where other dynamic parameters are unreliable 3
Interpreting Results
- Positive PLR test (≥10% increase in cardiac output):
- Patient is likely fluid responsive
- Intravenous fluid administration is appropriate 1
- Negative PLR test (no significant increase in cardiac output):
- Patient is unlikely to respond to fluid administration
- Consider vasopressors or inotropic support instead 1
Clinical Decision-Making
- If PLR test is positive:
- Administer 500 mL crystalloid solution over 10-15 minutes
- Reassess after fluid bolus to confirm response
- If PLR test is negative:
- Avoid further fluid boluses
- Focus on vascular tone and chronotropy/inotropy 1
Limitations and Pitfalls
Situations Where PLR May Be Less Reliable
- Intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome
- Severe right ventricular dysfunction
- Patients with compression stockings or bandages on lower extremities
- Patients with significant pain during position change
Technical Considerations
- Real-time cardiac output measurement is essential for accurate interpretation
- Arterial pulse pressure alone is less reliable (60% sensitivity, 85% specificity) 3
- Ensure proper positioning technique - semi-recumbent to supine PLR produces larger hemodynamic effects than supine-to-leg-raise PLR 2
Advantages Over Other Methods
- Non-invasive and reversible
- No administration of fluids required
- Reliable in patients with arrhythmias and spontaneous breathing
- Can be performed repeatedly without cumulative effect
- Avoids unnecessary fluid administration in non-responders
The PLR test provides a reliable, non-invasive method to guide fluid management in hypotensive patients, helping clinicians make informed decisions about whether fluid administration or vasopressor support is the most appropriate intervention.