Determining Medical Competency
Medical competency is determined through assessment of cognitive knowledge, technical skills, clinical reasoning, interpersonal communication, professionalism, and systems-based practice using multiple evaluation methods including direct observation, written examinations, simulation, and peer/patient feedback. 1
Core Components of Medical Competency Assessment
Institutional Framework
- The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations requires that granting of clinical staff privileges be based on assessment against professional criteria specified in medical staff bylaws 1
- Medical institutions and professional societies are charged with identifying criteria that constitute professional competence and evaluating physicians accordingly 1
- Assessment should be evidence-based, and where evidence is not available, expert opinion is utilized to formulate recommendations 1
Multidimensional Assessment Domains
Medical Knowledge
Technical Skills
Clinical Reasoning
Interpersonal and Communication Skills
Professionalism
Systems-Based Practice
Assessment Methods
Formative Assessment (Assessment FOR Learning)
- Written goals and objectives for each rotation/training period 1
- Mid-rotation feedback to guide improvement 1
- Direct observation with constructive feedback 3
- Self-assessment and reflection opportunities 2
Summative Assessment (Assessment OF Learning)
- Multiple-choice questions and standardized tests for knowledge assessment 2, 4
- Direct observation of procedures and clinical encounters 1, 4
- Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) 4
- Standardized patient encounters 2, 4
- 360-degree evaluations including peers, patients, and other healthcare team members 2
Implementation Best Practices
Evaluator Selection and Training
- Evaluators must be properly trained to provide valid assessments 3
- Multiple evaluators should be used to increase reliability 3
- Evaluations should be based on direct observation whenever possible 1, 2
Documentation and Synthesis
- Electronic tracking systems for competency assessment data 3
- Regular review and synthesis of multiple assessment types 3
- Documentation of remediation plans when deficiencies are identified 1
Continuous Quality Improvement
- Regular review and updating of competency assessment methods 1
- Multisociety task forces to maintain competency documents as practice evolves 1
- Incorporation of new assessment approaches as they are validated 5
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Over-reliance on knowledge-based testing that fails to assess clinical performance 2
- Focusing on procedure volume rather than quality of performance 1
- Neglecting "intrinsic" competencies like communication and professionalism 5
- Failing to provide timely, specific feedback to guide improvement 3
- Using assessment tools that haven't been validated for their intended purpose 4
Medical competency assessment is complex and requires a comprehensive approach that goes beyond simply testing factual knowledge. The most effective systems incorporate multiple assessment methods, direct observation of clinical performance, and regular feedback to ensure physicians develop and maintain the skills necessary for high-quality patient care.