Can the time between turning patients be increased?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Turning Frequency for Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Immobile Patients

The time between turning patients can be increased beyond the traditional 2-hour interval in certain circumstances, particularly when patients are on pressure-reducing surfaces and when individualized risk assessment supports it.

Current Evidence on Turning Intervals

The traditional practice of turning patients every 2 hours to prevent pressure ulcers has been challenged by recent evidence:

  • The 2023 International Journal of Nursing Studies guideline acknowledges that while turning patients is important for pressure injury prevention, the optimal turning frequency remains unclear 1
  • Competing clinical priorities often make strict adherence to 2-hour turning schedules challenging in real-world settings 1
  • A 2007 randomized controlled trial found that repositioning patients on pressure-reducing mattresses alternately for 2 hours in lateral position and 4 hours in supine position did not result in statistically significant differences in pressure ulcer incidence compared to repositioning every 4 hours 2

Factors That Allow for Extended Turning Intervals

Extended turning intervals may be appropriate when:

  1. Pressure-redistributing surfaces are in use:

    • Specialized support surfaces can reduce pressure and allow for longer intervals between manual repositioning
    • Evidence suggests that pressure-reducing mattresses can mitigate the need for frequent turning 2
  2. Patient-specific risk factors are considered:

    • Braden Scale scores and other validated risk assessment tools should guide turning frequency
    • Higher-risk patients may still require more frequent repositioning
  3. Proper positioning technique is used:

    • The 2016 study showed that using a patient positioning system (PPS) achieved better turning angles (31.03° vs 22.39° with standard of care) and maintained position better over time 3
    • Proper positioning with appropriate support to relieve pressure on bony prominences is essential 4

Implementation Recommendations

To safely implement extended turning intervals:

  1. Conduct thorough risk assessment:

    • Use validated tools like the Braden Scale to stratify patient risk 4
    • Consider patient-specific factors such as mobility, nutrition, and comorbidities
  2. Document and monitor:

    • Record each position change and skin condition 4
    • Regularly inspect skin, especially over bony prominences
  3. Use appropriate support surfaces:

    • Ensure patients at risk are on appropriate pressure-redistributing surfaces
    • Consider specialized positioning devices that maintain proper positioning 3
  4. Adjust frequency based on individual needs:

    • A 2023 systematic review confirms that the optimal turning frequency varies depending on healthcare setting and patient condition 5
    • Patients with emergency ICU/HCU admissions may require more frequent turning as they are at higher risk 6

Important Caveats

  • Very high-risk patients may still require more frequent repositioning
  • Regular skin assessment is crucial regardless of turning frequency
  • The 2024 expert panel guidelines emphasize that mobilization should be protocol-based with both active and passive components 1
  • If signs of skin breakdown appear, revert to more frequent repositioning

Conclusion

While the traditional 2-hour turning schedule remains a reasonable baseline, evidence supports that turning intervals can be safely extended to 3-4 hours for patients on pressure-redistributing surfaces who demonstrate stable skin integrity. The decision should be based on comprehensive risk assessment, proper positioning technique, and ongoing skin monitoring.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Two Methods for Turning and Positioning and the Effect on Pressure Ulcer Development: A Comparison Cohort Study.

Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society, 2016

Guideline

Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Immobile Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Turning and Repositioning Frequency to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries Among Adult Patients: Systematic Review.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.